thedddd
Well-Known Member
I am not sure how, in the same post, you say 4/$52 for Markakis is insane, and then suggest we trade to Mark Trumbo, who is just not good at playing the game of baseball. I agree that the deal for Markakis is a head scratcher, but at least he provides value to the team, Trumbo provides nothing. In all honesty, if we were to trade for Trumbo, he would be nothing more than a platoon player with Pedro, seems fairly pointless to have two guys filling one position whose only positive attribute is that at one point in their careers that could hit a baseball a long way, on occasion. Not consistently, just occasionally.
Actually there is a HUGE difference. One is being paid 4 years at 52 million, the other still gets arbitration with an estimated salary of around 5.7 million.
Trust me I am no proponent of trading for the guy unless you can get him for a minor leaguer, which I now read Arizona won't go cheap on him. And honestly wasn't thinking of a platoon at all, I seriously think they are stupid but I also understand the necessity when you don't have enough talent at a position like 1B. Hence why I didn't get letting Sanchez go.
Also the other alternative is Mike Morse for more money/years? I would rather they spend on quality starting pitching. With Morse who has great hitting splits makes Alvarez pointless and unfortunately he would get less in return than Trumbo would. Also if you look at the numbers Trumbo is a better defender at 1B/OF than Morse is.