thecrow124
Active Member
burnett might not be bad if we gave 2 very suspect prospects and ate this years salary,
but being on the hook for next years puts us in the same position we were let winter that we didn't want an old pitcher, 500 for his career with good teams, paid like an ace (by pirate standards) and not sure if we would get that. He couldn't even pitch our biggest game at the end of 2013.
not willing to pay him next year. if he would waive that, i would consider (or guarantees he would actually retire so we are out of the contract next year)
I agree......but is Philly going to take marginal prospects in return for Burnett? Would they be willing to eat half of any money he earns on the ridiculess contract they signed him to?
The more I think about it though, I would actually prefer to trade for Ian Kennedy, we would have to give up more in prospects, but he would also cost less and he is in the prime of his career with another year of control.