PATSOX08
New Member
nice!And you are doing what, telling people what they are doing, what are you doing?

nice!And you are doing what, telling people what they are doing, what are you doing?
And you are doing what, telling people what they are doing, what are you doing?
rings
why qbs win games and championships by themselves
well, your crap about "single-handedly" is a bunch of crap
This debate will never end. So expect many more threads on the subject.
This debate will never end. So expect many more threads on the subject.
So nobody cares to answer this ^^^^??? Weird.
Aikman & Montana never lost Super Bowls. I'd take either one of them over Brady. Two of the most accurate passers of all time.
Marino is/was a better qb than John Elway..........period!
The only one to rival Marino was Montana.And if you were to reverse the teams they played on,Marino would of had four rings,not joe.
And no,Joe would not of had all those passing records either.
QBs are not just interchangable like that.
Each guy brings his own specific skill set and the offense contours to that. Marino was à statue and Montana's offense required him to move around in the pocket and roll out.
I am sure that both could have been successful wherever they went, but the offenses would look différent if they swapped spots.[/QUOTE]
Well duhhhh......lol
But when comparing,you assume the only thing would have changed would be just the qbs.
Tom Brady is a product of the system he plays in.
the Kobe Bryant of the NFL, if you will.
a complete media manufactured FRAUD if i've ever seen one.
ZERO SuperBowl Victories without SpyGate.
No way in hell....................Aikman is way overrated.
Brady is 10xs the qb than he ever was.
montana,i`d take either one.