jerseyhawksfan79
Well-Known Member
That's an easy one to rankYeah I have them ranked as by far worst division
That's an easy one to rankYeah I have them ranked as by far worst division
Yet the NFCW will have 2 or possibly 3 teams in the playoffs so how can you rank them as a bad division?So is the NFC West
Yet the NFCW will have 2 or possibly 3 teams in the playoffs so how can you rank them as a bad division?
Well yes wild card teams are generally low seed teams, can't have 3 teams winning 1 division. Good job champ.They played the NFC East of course they are going to put forth the most playoff teams in the playoffs. All low seeded teams though.
Well yes wild card teams are generally low seed teams, can't have 3 teams winning 1 division. Good job champ.
But if you're a wild card team I guess your not very good. Or if you come from the NFCE or west the teams just suck.I'm not sure if you noticed, but historically, playoff teams are in the playoffs....
But if you're a wild card team I guess your not very good. Or if you come from the NFCE or west the teams just suck.
Also the more teams with winning records in the division means the top team will have less win in general because they have to play each other.But if you're a wild card team I guess your not very good. Or if you come from the NFCE or west the teams just suck.
Well yes wild card teams are generally low seed teams, can't have 3 teams winning 1 division. Good job champ.
Good pointJust remember the source...he's not a good one
Yes but Koy wouldn't understand that.Also the more teams with winning records in the division means the top team will have less win in general because they have to play each other.
Actually being the third seed in the entire conference is pretty darn good. So what elite division are you talking about?Low seed division winner. 3rd seed team. Would have been a wild card weekend team in the old system. Outside looking in on the elite of the conference enjoying bye weeks in the top 2 seeds.
Actually being the third seed in the entire conference is pretty darn good. So what elite division are you talking about?
Also the more teams with winning records in the division means the top team will have less win in general because they have to play each other.
So tell me who the elite divisions are3rd seed is a low seed for the division winners. 1 & 2 are the top seeds and 3 & 4 the low seeds. Doomed to a road playoff game in round 2.
There’s just not enough games to go around for teams to play each other and all of them have top tier records, I could see your point if only 2 teams had good records and the other 2 didn’t, but when 3 teams win around 10ish games odds are the division winner won’t be top of the league.I'm pretty sure outside of the 49ers the rest of the division hasn't lost a game to the NFC East. That is a 4-0 boost to any team's record that are above the level of bad. That will inflate an entire division's overall record in comparison to other divisions who were scheduled to play divisions that provide far more legitimate challenges.
There’s just not enough games to go around for teams to play each other and all of them have top tier records, I could see your point if only 2 teams had good records and the other 2 didn’t, but when 3 teams win around 10ish games odds are the division winner won’t be top of the league.
The nfc has no truly great teams, I’m not sure why you think this only relates to the nfc.3 teams got a 4-0 boost to their records due to playing a historically shitty division. When those teams stepped outside of the NFC East the wheels were falling off. Seahawks were 6-4 outside of the NFC East, Rams 5-5 outside of the NFC East and the Cardinals 4-6 outside of the NFC East.
The division is filled with middle of the road teams. No truly great teams but also no truly awful teams even as depleted as the 49ers are with injuries. Although the 49ers were bad enough to go 1-3 vs the NFC East.
The nfc has no truly great teams, I’m not sure why you think this only relates to the nfc.