Omar 382
Well-Known Member
As usual, old school idiots are wrong and the nerds are right. Yawn.
As usual, old school idiots are wrong and the nerds are right. Yawn.
Interesting stat on the deep ball with Alex...gonna be interesting to see if it continues to increase this year...
how about we refrain from name calling ? old school guys works just as well . and yes i will enforce the rule on name callingAs usual, old school idiots are wrong and the nerds are right. Yawn.
how about we refrain from name calling ? old school guys works just as well . and yes i will enforce the rule on name calling
LOLBig O, we don't use the word idiot here. That is how you get banned. Not sure who the old school idiot is though. ehb is young and I don't think he is an idiot.
not that serious that it degenerates into a name calling fest i dont think its too much to ask to be civilLOL
Sports forums are serious shit, guys!
You still have to run the ball, but as I said a little bit ago the Redskins proved the last three years you do not have to run the effectively to make play action work. What makes it work is you full the defense or some defensive players into hesitating or even better taking a step up, then they are late getting into their drops or covering at all.
Last thing I’ll say to this post. Yes, all the above is true, but my point is if your run game isn’t very effective the defense won’t respect it and hesitate or step up.
You wanna know why you need to be able to run the ball? Clock management and wearing the opposing defense down. Don't you think there were a few games last year where we could have used a clock eating offensive drive to keep the opposing offense off the field?
And ask any defensive lineman. They get burned out much quicker defending the run than rushing the passer.
This whole talk of a strong running game not helping play action passing is ludicrous. It just doesn't pass the smell test, irregardless of what some statistic says. Again, ask any Offensive lineman. Is it easier to pass block on a play action pass than a standard drop back passing play? They will all say it is. Which means that the QB should have both more time and a cleaner pocket. Why is this? Because the DL and LBs all freeze for a second while analyzing if pass or run. Which gives the TEs and WRs a step. How can that not help?Correct, several of us have talked about play action but killing the clock with a lead is a big deal. Old timers remember that Joe Gibbs 80s Redskins did most of their passing in the first three quarters and then let the Diesel run the clock out.
This whole talk of a strong running game not helping play action passing is ludicrous. It just doesn't pass the smell test, irregardless of what some statistic says. Again, ask any Offensive lineman. Is it easier to pass block on a play action pass than a standard drop back passing play? They will all say it is. Which means that the QB should have both more time and a cleaner pocket. Why is this? Because the DL and LBs all freeze for a second while analyzing if pass or run. Which gives the TEs and WRs a step. How can that not help?
But it only happens if the defense respects your running game. And they only respect it if it is good.
He succeeded without the benefit of freezing the defense. Its that simple. He pre read the defense and was good and finding the opening in the defense anyway.It does sound weird but explain the success KC had with the play action if running game matters. We didn’t exactly have an effective running game during his tenure.
He succeeded without the benefit of freezing the defense. Its that simple. He pre read the defense and was good and finding the opening in the defense anyway.
This was a strength of KC that the haters always overlooked. I expect he will only get better in Minn. While our good QB now only gets older.......
He succeeded without the benefit of freezing the defense. Its that simple. He pre read the defense and was good and finding the opening in the defense anyway.
This was a strength of KC that the haters always overlooked. I expect he will only get better in Minn. While our good QB now only gets older.......
I always thought that Cousins pre snap and his ability to read a defense was severely underrated aspect of his game. He put up numbers with shit weapons, zero running game, and a defense that allowed points and couldnt get off the field thus making it 1 dimensional/predictable
Its a very real possibility that he will be hoisting the lombardi trophy year one... The Skins local media/PR spin would be a lot of fun to watch if that happened.
If the Vikings win the SB - more power to them. However it is not as if Cousins will be the only reason. They have tons of talent on that team & perhaps Cousins will compliment that nicely. It is as not as if Cousins remained that the Skins would have a big shot at doing the same. If the Vikes go far & the DC media makes a big deal out of it - who gives a shit. Why should anyone care about any media takes in this era?