Winning the Superbowl is great!

[STBR 27]

Other posters brought up SB XL, not me. Thank you.

Wilson did NOT go off on Denver. 18/25. Not exactly blazing the air. He only threw 25 times and completed only 18 of them. Hell, his very first pass he missed a WIDE OPEN receiver.

I mentioned Seattle fans were over SB XL and you "defended" the win multiple times, with photos and video that no one cared about, except you. We even gave you props for winning the game and you posted more crap about that game.

What else did you want Wilson to do? The drives ended in the endzone or through the uprights, how else was he going to get more yards or more attempts? There was no more field? 18/25 is pretty damn good, obviously the first one was jitters, but what do you expect from a 2nd year player in the SB?

 

[Midnightangel]

I mentioned Seattle fans were over SB XL and you "defended" the win multiple times, with photos and video that no one cared about, except you. We even gave you props for winning the game and you posted more crap about that game.

What else did you want Wilson to do? The drives ended in the endzone or through the uprights, how else was he going to get more yards or more attempts? There was no more field? 18/25 is pretty damn good, obviously the first one was jitters, but what do you expect from a 2nd year player in the SB?

Yes, 18/25 IS pretty solid. I'm not trashing his performance, I'm just saying he didn't 'go off' like you said he would.

Had you been willing to entertain opposing views on that, it would have been fine but no, you didn't want to hear anything that opposed you.

No matter my arguments, I was always willing to listen to an intelligent argument from the other side. Seattle fans weren't.

That's my point.

 

[SonnyCID]

Yes, 18/25 IS pretty solid. I'm not trashing his performance, I'm just saying he didn't 'go off' like you said he would.

Had you been willing to entertain opposing views on that, it would have been fine but no, you didn't want to hear anything that opposed you.

No matter my arguments, I was always willing to listen to an intelligent argument from the other side. Seattle fans weren't.

That's my point.

The point was that the offense only punted once. How much more could he have gone off?

When Denver started scoring less points in the playoffs but were punting less too, according to many, it was a sign of their record breaking offense improving.

 

[SonnyCID]

Yes, 18/25 IS pretty solid. I'm not trashing his performance, I'm just saying he didn't 'go off' like you said he would.

Had you been willing to entertain opposing views on that, it would have been fine but no, you didn't want to hear anything that opposed you.

No matter my arguments, I was always willing to listen to an intelligent argument from the other side. Seattle fans weren't.

That's my point.

And neither were Denver fans. Anyone that suggested that Seattle could blow them out of the water was treated like nothing more than an uneducated homer.

 

[Midnightangel]

The point was that the offense only punted once. How much more could he have gone off?

When Denver started scoring less points in the playoffs but were punting less too, according to many, it was a sign of their record breaking offense improving.

OK, a counter point.

You keep pointing out that they only punted once.

Let's recap...

You started off with a safety. 2-0.

On the free kick from Denver you got pretty good field position and got fairly deep into Denver territory. Yes? You had to settle for 3.

Denver goes 3 and out.

I think you guys went 3 and out as well.

Then Denver went 3 and out again.

You had great starting field position and got deep into Denver territory, and again had to settle for 3.

Score: 8-0

You had been deep in Denver's territory twice and came out with 3's instead of 7's.

Russell Wilson did not 'go off'. He got great field position to start drives, and didn't have to travel very far to get points of some kind. That's a credit to your defense, not him.

I'm not saying he was horrible, merely that he didn't 'go off'.

More proof of this is that he didn't win the MVP.

 

[Broncosr0k]

First comment: I thought this was going to be a trolling thread but the more I read the more it seems just celebratory. I can't blame seahawk fans I would be enjoying the win too, especially such a one-sided win.

Second: Russell Wilson did not need to go 30/40 for 4 TDs. He did what was needed. Still had a good performance (like everyone on the seahawks).

That was a great game from the seahawks. I hope my broncos can recover a little dignity next year.

 

[SonnyCID]

OK, a counter point.

You keep pointing out that they only punted once.

Let's recap...

You started off with a safety. 2-0.

On the free kick from Denver you got pretty good field position and got fairly deep into Denver territory. Yes? You had to settle for 3.

Denver goes 3 and out.

I think you guys went 3 and out as well.

Then Denver went 3 and out again.

You had great starting field position and got deep into Denver territory, and again had to settle for 3.

Score: 8-0

You had been deep in Denver's territory twice and came out with 3's instead of 7's.

Russell Wilson did not 'go off'. He got great field position to start drives, and didn't have to travel very far to get points of some kind. That's a credit to your defense, not him.

I'm not saying he was horrible, merely that he didn't 'go off'.

More proof of this is that he didn't win the MVP.

Denver's defense started strong. But like many Hawk fans told you could happen, they wore down.

 

[Midnightangel]

Denver's defense started strong. But like many Hawk fans told you could happen, they wore down.

They weren't worn down by Lynch, which is what Seahawk fans were claiming. They were just tired from being on the field all the time since Denver's offense couldn't move the ball unless they were turning it over.

5 turnovers, Sonny.

2 INT's

2 Fumbles

1 turnover on downs.

That's the story of the game. Not Wilson, or Lynch.

And again, it's not so much the bragging that ticked me off it's that when someone tried to give a logical argument to the contrary it wasn't allowed.

 

[WizardHawk]

They weren't worn down by Lynch, which is what Seahawk fans were claiming. They were just tired from being on the field all the time since Denver's offense couldn't move the ball unless they were turning it over.

5 turnovers, Sonny.

2 INT's

2 Fumbles

1 turnover on downs.

That's the story of the game. Not Wilson, or Lynch.

And again, it's not so much the bragging that ticked me off it's that when someone tried to give a logical argument to the contrary it wasn't allowed.

You are simply retarded. I'm convinced of it now.

Tell me how anyone can say both the running back and QB had a bad day in a game with no turnovers and only one punt the entire game? Tell me how a QB has a bad game when they ended with 123 passer rating. Tell me how bad they were when the scored 27 points off the offense in the Super Bowl against a defense we were told all week would totally shut them down because they were a terrible offense.

The facts are the facts whether you like them or not. Wilson did NOT have a bad game. PERIOD. Lynch was fairly quiet and we already told you why. Hell, he didn't even play one down of the 4th quarter and only had 4 carries in the 3rd quarter. How about that second quarter then? The offense only ran 6 real plays. They officially ran 8 total plays, but the last two were to run out the clock at the half.

I guess Manning was responsible for every point Seattle had right? I mean both their QB and RB sucked ass in that game so someone has to get credit for their 43 points.

 

[WizardHawk]

OK, a counter point.

You keep pointing out that they only punted once.

Let's recap...

You started off with a safety. 2-0.

On the free kick from Denver you got pretty good field position and got fairly deep into Denver territory. Yes? You had to settle for 3.

Denver goes 3 and out.

I think you guys went 3 and out as well.

Then Denver went 3 and out again.

You had great starting field position and got deep into Denver territory, and again had to settle for 3.

Score: 8-0

You had been deep in Denver's territory twice and came out with 3's instead of 7's.

Russell Wilson did not 'go off'. He got great field position to start drives, and didn't have to travel very far to get points of some kind. That's a credit to your defense, not him.

I'm not saying he was horrible, merely that he didn't 'go off'.

More proof of this is that he didn't win the MVP.

Negative. You fail at a recap

Seahawks only punt came in the 3rd quarter. In the first half they went FG, FG, TD on their possessions. Denver was driving the ball fairly well at times and was chewing up the clock as hard as they could.

So let me see if I have this correct. Your proof that Seattle sucked on offense in the SB is they had to settle for two FG's in the first quarter? I mean THAT'S it? Are you for real?

So in your mind FG's are as bad as punts.

Russell Wilson did not 'go off'. He got great field position to start drives, and didn't have to travel very far to get points of some kind. That's a credit to your defense, not him.

So then tell us how Seattle had more time of possession then? Let's hear how this one works out.

Wilson went 18/25 206 and 2TD's, threw for 11 in a row at one point and averaged 7.9 yards a throw. 7.9y a throw. On what planet is that a bad day? Seriously.

The Seahawks end with 135y rushing and all you can talk about is Lynch when we told you why he never got going, and told you why before the game started ffs. I have zero doubt he breaks 100y if that game is closer and he is used in the 3rd and 4th quarter. NONE. I'd bet anything on it.

 

[WizardHawk]

First comment: I thought this was going to be a trolling thread but the more I read the more it seems just celebratory. I can't blame seahawk fans I would be enjoying the win too, especially such a one-sided win.

Second: Russell Wilson did not need to go 30/40 for 4 TDs. He did what was needed. Still had a good performance (like everyone on the seahawks).

That was a great game from the seahawks. I hope my broncos can recover a little dignity next year.

Good post. I won't speak for all Seahawk fans, but I think most of us have no animosity for the Broncos or their fans. There is no reason to troll your fans or bash them after that game, and in fact I know a lot of us feel bad about how your fans had to have felt after that game. Bad to lose, but I can only imagine what it is like to lose that badly with all of the expectations you all had for the game. Hopefully you all get your injured players back and setup for a good run next season and we will see you at the Clink. Have as good of an off season as you can.

 

[Midnightangel]

Negative. You fail at a recap

Seahawks only punt came in the 3rd quarter. In the first half they went FG, FG, TD on their possessions. Denver was driving the ball fairly well at times and was chewing up the clock as hard as they could.

So let me see if I have this correct. Your proof that Seattle sucked on offense in the SB is they had to settle for two FG's in the first quarter? I mean THAT'S it? Are you for real?

So in your mind FG's are as bad as punts.


So then tell us how Seattle had more time of possession then? Let's hear how this one works out.

Wilson went 18/25 206 and 2TD's, threw for 11 in a row at one point and averaged 7.9 yards a throw. 7.9y a throw. On what planet is that a bad day? Seriously.

The Seahawks end with 135y rushing and all you can talk about is Lynch when we told you why he never got going, and told you why before the game started ffs. I have zero doubt he breaks 100y if that game is closer and he is used in the 3rd and 4th quarter. NONE. I'd bet anything on it.

Apologies, where did I say they 'sucked' on offense. Please, show me.

I said Russell didn't 'go off'. They were deep in Denver territory TWICE and came up with FG's. Not bad but not exactly 'going off' either. If you want to say Russell 'went off' on Denver it should have been 16-0.

Again, not saying he had a bad day - please learn to read. (since you want to make it personal...)

I'm saying he didn't 'go off' as was boasted prior to the game by one of your ilk.

And he didn't.

Lynch didn't rush for 150, as boasted by Wedgie, either.

You'd bet anything he'd have broken 100 if the game would have been closer? First, that wasn't the boast by Wedgie. Wedgie said 150. As for him breaking 100 if the game were closer....

Prove it.

Oh wait...you can't. It's all theory. Thank you.

It's not the bragging I mind so much as you guys refused to listen to intelligent arguments explaining why those things wouldn't happen.

What's amazing to me is how much time you spend talking with me about this when....

Wait for it......

You've said before many times that you don't care what I think. <--------

So which is it, laughing boy? Do you care or don't you?

You must. You're pissed that I haven't congradulated you on the win yet, but somehow you've forgetten how many times you or your fellow fans called me a bitch in the last couple weeks. Or insane.

So, why would you care about my opinion anyway?

 

[WizardHawk]

Lynch didn't rush for 150, as boasted by Wedgie, either.

He told he was trolling you on it BEFORE the game actually happened. Sorry, but you bit on it and have massive obsessed over it ever since. ONE guy says something extreme and you have been acting like every one of our fans have said it or agreed with it. You clearly have issues.

It's not the bragging I mind so much as you guys refused to listen to intelligent arguments explaining why those things wouldn't happen.

The ONLY thing I said about Lynch and 150y is YOU can't say it was impossible. You can say it is improbable, but not impossible. That's it and yet now your tantrum over it has lasted for over two full weeks.

But how about these things you also said wouldn't happen:

both Phillip Rivers and Tom Brady are better QB's than Russell Wilson.
If Denver's defense can handle them, they can handle Russell.

Denver's defense is about as good as Seattle's offense. It's the truth you don't want to face.
Like I said, I hope your team is just as delusional about Denver as you seem to be.

There were several others, but this was a good place to start. You asserted that anyone suggesting Seattle was going to blow out Denver was disrespecting them, told us Denver would have no problem stopping Seattle because of who they had already stopped and how much better they were than us, and were in several discussions with bronco fans (Where is that Morpheus anyway, guess he didn't feel like coming and taking back his words either huh) talking about how Seattle's defense hadn't played anyone all year and was going to get a wake up call.

You haven't been able to deal with what happened and aren't willing to take back any of your words and that's fine. We don't need you to do the right thing for us to enjoy our trophy.

What's amazing to me is how much time you spend talking with me about this when....
Wait for it......
You've said before many times that you don't care what I think. <--------

And I don't give a shit about you. It's just fun exposing you as the football fraud you are. Once they banned breaker I guess you felt the need to fill in for him and I have no problem showing anyone bored enough to read all of this drivel (from both of us) how little you really know.



Oh and

You must. You're pissed that I haven't congradulated you on the win yet, but somehow you've forgetten how many times you or your fellow fans called me a bitch in the last couple weeks. Or insane.

I love how often you point out things we have called you, but do you want me to point out yours?
Now THAT'S the definition of hypocrisy. YOU call people names and then question them doing it back.
That's some funny stuff right there.

 

[WizardHawk]

And I love all of your nonsense about anyone else being arrogant. I have literally never seen a more arrogant person online than you are. You claimed it was arrogance when any of our fans suggested they might win this game big... AND THEN THEY DID.

Why don't you just man up (lol) and admit when you were wrong and move on? You threw a massive tirade demanding I apologize for a double post which is so freaking minor and not apology worthy and yet just can't stand up for your own words... but then call others arrogant. Simply amazing.

 

[Midnightangel]

He told he was trolling you on it BEFORE the game actually happened. Sorry, but you bit on it and have massive obsessed over it ever since. ONE guy says something extreme and you have been acting like every one of our fans have said it or agreed with it. You clearly have issues.

The ONLY thing I said about Lynch and 150y is YOU can't say it was impossible. You can say it is improbable, but not impossible. That's it and yet now your tantrum over it has lasted for over two full weeks.

But how about these things you also said wouldn't happen:



There were several others, but this was a good place to start. You asserted that anyone suggesting Seattle was going to blow out Denver was disrespecting them, told us Denver would have no problem stopping Seattle because of who they had already stopped and how much better they were than us, and were in several discussions with bronco fans (Where is that Morpheus anyway, guess he didn't feel like coming and taking back his words either huh) talking about how Seattle's defense hadn't played anyone all year and was going to get a wake up call.

You haven't been able to deal with what happened and aren't willing to take back any of your words and that's fine. We don't need you to do the right thing for us to enjoy our trophy.


And I don't give a shit about you. It's just fun exposing you as the football fraud you are. Once they banned breaker I guess you felt the need to fill in for him and I have no problem showing anyone bored enough to read all of this drivel (from both of us) how little you really know.



Oh and


I love how often you point out things we have called you, but do you want me to point out yours?
Now THAT'S the definition of hypocrisy. YOU call people names and then question them doing it back.
That's some funny stuff right there.

I have no problem with what happened.

First, I'm taking up rent free space in your head. Even after you say you don't care about my opinion, you continue to debate me - and lose.

Lynch didn't rush for 150. I said he wouldn't even break 100 - and he didn't.

I said Russell wouldn't 'go off' on Denver, and he didn't.

I didn't call anyone a name until names started being lobbed at me first.

I disgreed with what Wedgie said and for that you and others called me a 'hater' and a 'troll'.

PS...if he said that JUST to get a response, doesn't that make HIM a troll? Feel free to call him out on that, if you feel that's what he did.

I'll bet you wont.

You Seattle fans don't understand that the other 31 fan bases aren't drinking the green Kool aid so we don't see things the way you do.

If you want to make insane predictions like Lynch is going to rush for a buck-fifty, keep it on the Seattle board. If you say that in the main forum you're going to get a debate on it.

And that's really the issue.

You guys just couldn't stand anyone that saw things differently than you. No one was allowed to have a differing opinion. Anyone that did was attacked like a Jewish woman at an Al-Queda pep rally.

As for my football knowledge, it would appear I was just a right as you and your ilk. I DID predict Lynch wouldn't rush for 100, did I not? I DID predict Russell wouldn't 'go off' on Denver, did I not?

Did not even YOU predict that Denver was going to crack 24 points? As I recall your words were, "Manning is going to get his points. He'll score between 21 and 24".

Well now....it seems you got that one wrong. Did you not?

Did you predict the kickoff return for a TD?

Nope.

Well why not if you have SOOOOOOOO much football knowledge.

 

[cwood]

And neither were Denver fans. Anyone that suggested that Seattle could blow them out of the water was treated like nothing more than an uneducated homer.

To be my normal fair self, that wasn't a reasonable expectation going into the game. They were being homers, not highly educated students of the NFL when making those predictions. Blowouts like that don't happen very often in the NFL period. Much less against a quality opponent in the Super Bowl.

 

[Midnightangel]

To be my normal fair self, that wasn't a reasonable expectation going into the game. They were being homers, not highly educated students of the NFL when making those predictions. Blowouts like that don't happen very often in the NFL period. Much less against a quality opponent in the Super Bowl.

And predicting so or that your team is going to dominate is fine - so long as one allows for an opposing view without flaming.

Seahawk fans couldn't handle that.

 

[WizardHawk]

First, I'm taking up rent free space in your head. Even after you say you don't care about my opinion, you continue to debate me - and lose.

LOL!!! Who is in who's head now? Not only am I DEEPLY in your head, but so is our entire fan base. You do like to accuse others of things that actually define you don't you?

PS...if he said that JUST to get a response, doesn't that make HIM a troll? Feel free to call him out on that, if you feel that's what he did.

I'll bet you wont.

Reading not a big thing for you is it? I said this just a few posts ago...

He told he was trolling you on it BEFORE the game actually happened. Sorry, but you bit on it and have massive obsessed over it ever since.

What part of HE admitted he was trolling you didn't you get? So yes I'm saying he trolled you and man did it work. Best example of trolling into someone's head I think I've EVER seen.

And I also already told you I have done my share of trolling. Have never denied I do or have. Difference between you and I is I will own my words, will you? (pssst, we already know the answer to that)

You guys just couldn't stand anyone that saw things differently than you. No one was allowed to have a differing opinion.

...says the woman who has been telling everyone for weeks how they can think and feel because they don't follow a team with 6 rings or they dare to have opinions about their team that you really don't agree with.

You cannot find even ONE example of me saying anything about your right to have a different opinion. Not one. YOU are the one who told others they don't have the right to think Lynch will rush for 150y or that Wilson will have a big day. YOU do that often. Again, you are seriously the pot calling the kettle black and once again cannot and will not present even one example of it after I give you several of yours. More pure fail.

As for my football knowledge, it would appear I was just a right as you and your ilk. I DID predict Lynch wouldn't rush for 100, did I not? I DID predict Russell wouldn't 'go off' on Denver, did I not?

And you keep on refusing to address the other quotes you left us before the game. Why? because you'd have to actually admit you were wrong and we know you CAN'T do that right?

Did not even YOU predict that Denver was going to crack 24 points? As I recall your words were, "Manning is going to get his points. He'll score between 21 and 24".
Well now....it seems you got that one wrong. Did you not?
Did you predict the kickoff return for a TD?
Nope.
Well why not if you have SOOOOOOOO much football knowledge.

I admit it. You actually stumped me this time. You have managed to top even your own record for dumbest post of the year to date. Well done, well done indeed.

So because I didn't predict the actual final score of 43-8 it means I don't know anything about football? LOOOOL!! That really does take the cake for dumbest damn thing I've read in a long time.

Not shit I didn't predict that. No kidding I didn't predict a single digit score for Manning. Ya think? Who did really? But for whatever reason you'd rather keep showing how fucking stupid you are than just admit you too were wrong and move on... and then claim your in my head.

The only problem I have here is breaker was actually good at troll wars. You are about as challenging as Denver's offense was to the LOB last week. Oh, I have no doubt you are going to give me another attempt that I will once again shoot down in flames as it seems you really enjoy the abuse.

 

[HaroldSeattle]

Well I must say this back and forth here sure has me amused. Wizard seems to be cleaning Angels clock IMO.

 

[WizardHawk]

Well I must say this back and forth here sure has me amused. Wizard seems to be cleaning Angels clock IMO.

Remember when Breaker was at his best (worst? ) others would join in as well. She isn't filling that role very well. I'm sure you are likely the only one bothering to read any of it. Be surprised if more than 4 others actually read any of it beyond the first sentence in each post. I know I wouldn't lol. It was way more fun to troll Breaker. He was actually funny at times anyway and didn't take himself so seriously. Oh well.