- Thread starter
- #1
h0ckeysk83r
Haters gonna hate
Anybody think he will?
Anybody think he will?
Anybody think he will?
For what?
Conduct policy violation. Here is one write up of the incident. The couple of sentences at the end are the reason I don't think he will be suspended; but, with one violation already (DWI) who knows what will happen. Then there is the question of whether Edwards was under the NFL jurisdiction at the time.
Edwards entourage gets into a fight
I doubt Goodell cares about NFL jurisdiction, so to speak, he kinda showed that with suspending Pryor for NCAA violations. Although, I think that is a pretty good grounds for an appeal if it comes to a suspension. How can Goodell hold them to NFL policies during a time when they were no longer NFL employees.
I doubt Goodell cares about NFL jurisdiction, so to speak, he kinda showed that with suspending Pryor for NCAA violations. Although, I think that is a pretty good grounds for an appeal if it comes to a suspension. How can Goodell hold them to NFL policies during a time when they were no longer NFL employees.
With Edwards it's different because he is already in the league and was being locked out of his contract when the incident(s) occured. He wasn't being paid, wasn't receiving benefits, nothing. Therefore he shouldn't be subject to other terms of the contract that weren't being adhered to by the owners. It would definitely end up being a court battle if he was suspended, I guarantee that.
It's a totally different situation though. With Pryor, he didn't have to let him into the Supplemental Draft at all, so as a condition of him getting into the draft he got the suspension.
It's kind of like how a developer agrees to do a bunch of work for the city as a condition of him getting his project approved, even though legally the cities can't require him to do the work. If he wants the project he does it. If Pryor wanted to be in the NFL this season, he needed to accept the suspension, or else it's 2012 Draft for him.
With Edwards it's different because he is already in the league and was being locked out of his contract when the incident(s) occured. He wasn't being paid, wasn't receiving benefits, nothing. Therefore he shouldn't be subject to other terms of the contract that weren't being adhered to by the owners. It would definitely end up being a court battle if he was suspended, I guarantee that.
I think they are comparing Ginn vs Morgan to see which will be the third when Crabs comes back.
If I were the Supreme Commander, Crabs would come back as 4th on the depth - the little fucker!