thedddd
Well-Known Member
Wasn’t it the last time multiple complete games happen by the same team in a series?Care to guess @thedddd ?
Edit…oh I remember now the Sox wins were CG’s. Isn’t that the only time that happened?
Wasn’t it the last time multiple complete games happen by the same team in a series?Care to guess @thedddd ?
The second one was worse than the first one that they did call lolWow that was an easy call. Defender grabbed his jersey.
I think they cal it if Waller comes back int the guy after the ballI had lots of thoughts on the end of this one.
I have always thought if it is a penalty in the middle of the 1st qtr then it should be at the end of the game. Since they never call penalties on the final play of the game.
So I was pretty surprised when they threw a flag on the the "1st last play of the game" Do I think it changed anything in that play? No. But I was like ok they finally called a last play penalty. If I were to complain about that play. It would just be about consistency. Wasnt some egregious play or anything, but ok. They called it.
Then the 2nd Last play of the game, was a blatant hold of receiver & clear as day. But now they decide nah. Dont call a penalty on the final play of the game? Think they missed that boat. So the 2nd one definitely should have been called. Even with the idea of never calling them at end of games. That ship had sailed as well. (for this game)
This is like an umpire that is inconsistent on balls & strikes. it's a ball one minute & a strike the next?
They lost game one then won the next 4, all complete games. That will never ever happen again in the history of the game going forward. Maybe all 4 wins, but not 4 in a row. Maybe 2 in a row, tiny chance of 3. NEVER 4.Wasn’t it the last time multiple complete games happen by the same team in a series?
Edit…oh I remember now the Sox wins were CG’s. Isn’t that the only time that happened?
Sorry, thats a dumb take. Waller had to go to the ball not the defender otherwise it becomes an unwatchable ball. The ref missed the call period, it had nothing to do with Wallers play.I think they cal it if Waller comes back int the guy after the ball
Him fading away bailed the refs out
it certainly is over thinking the situationSorry, thats a dumb take. Waller had to go to the ball not the defender otherwise it becomes an unwatchable ball. The ref missed the call period, it had nothing to do with Wallers play.
If 19-14: Phi FG , on side kick, Phi FG beats you instead of OTThe math probably said something somewhere on why it was worth it.
"Why does my husband always yell Goff and then immediately finish"Lions win has me so pumped I plan to disappoint my wife for 35....maybe even 43 seconds tonight!