Thats why there will always be an * from OKC fans next to Durants championships. He won't get any respect until he can prove that he can win a title with his own team.
fify
Thats why there will always be an * from OKC fans next to Durants championships. He won't get any respect until he can prove that he can win a title with his own team.
That was also enough under the cap to sign a max player and retain all their core guys.
This is a once in a gereration situation.
No asterisk required. KD is an all time great player with 2 titles and counting.
How many of those were playoff games vs a great team with HCA?
What's the conclusion? Is the problem if Durant is more important than Curry or vice versa, or is it if GSW would underachieve without Durant?They also listed GSW’s record with Durant and without Curry. 46 games and they had a 28-18 record.
I wonder if the criticism will come as quickly as the praise.
We know how Lebron would be treated if he played this poorly in a conference finals
even if he was great in round 1.
Give Golden State all the credit in the world, but the superstar also has to take some of the blame when he is beyond horrible.
First time in his career given the bright lights and big stage, and he turtled up into a fetal position all series long.
I guess that is my point.
I really don't think either is bad.
Players have the right to do what is best for them in free agency. Teams are always trying to put out the best roster possible. It is hard to build a champion in the NBA and windows can be short lived.
I don't fault LeBron, I don't fault KD, I don't fault the Heat or the Warriors.
They all did what was best for them.
I do fault all the complainers out there. Opponents need to stop whining and find a way to compete. The Warrior run will end soon enough, just as all prior dynasties have eventually fizzled out.
"In their past 31 games in which Curry plays and Durant doesn’t, the Warriors are 30-1".They also listed GSW’s record with Durant and without Curry. 46 games and they had a 28-18 record.
I could understand wanting to put an asterisk by KD if he went to the Warriors and was just a role player or wasn't their best player.
But he has been their best player and was the MVP in both finals.
In fact, you can make a case that the Warriors may have at least 1 less title if they didn't have KD.
fify
This Steph Curry fella is knida good.
With 35+ pts., 5+ rebs. & 5 asts. in the first 2 games of a conference finals he became the 1st NBAer to do that since KAJ was a rookie in 1970.
nbcsports.com
Sounds like an excuse to me.
This Steph Curry fella is knida good.
With 35+ pts., 5+ rebs. & 5 asts. in the first 2 games of a conference finals he became the 1st NBAer to do that since KAJ was a rookie in 1970.
nbcsports.com
That's cool and all but pretty specific. Who did that in the first 2 games of a Finals? How about the second round? The first round? How about on Fridays?
That's a lotta halves there, Tony!
You'll have to explain the Tony reference to me.