- Thread starter
- #1
megalodon30
Archduke of Crosstown Busses
Coming out of college, most assumed Reggie Bush would have been the No. 1 pick after a dynamite college career. The Houston Texans decided differently and went with Mario Williams.
It can certainly be said the Williams had quite the career, better than Bush. But Williams never played in a Super Bowl, let alone won one. And of course, the ultimate goal of football is to win the Super Bowl.
Reggie Bush, though not really living up to the hype of a top pick, was a key piece of a SB winning offense. Bush may not have been worth the 1st overall pick in the end, but I'm sure the Saints are still glad the Texans passed on what would become an important piece for Drew Brees in their SB victory.
So what say you? Were the Texans wrong for having passed on Bush? Did the Saints make the right decision? If Nawlins had also decided to skip Bush, would they still have won Super Bowl 44?
It can certainly be said the Williams had quite the career, better than Bush. But Williams never played in a Super Bowl, let alone won one. And of course, the ultimate goal of football is to win the Super Bowl.
Reggie Bush, though not really living up to the hype of a top pick, was a key piece of a SB winning offense. Bush may not have been worth the 1st overall pick in the end, but I'm sure the Saints are still glad the Texans passed on what would become an important piece for Drew Brees in their SB victory.
So what say you? Were the Texans wrong for having passed on Bush? Did the Saints make the right decision? If Nawlins had also decided to skip Bush, would they still have won Super Bowl 44?