CitySushi
Andrew Wiggin's burner account
The amount of finals doesn't matter sniffer it's 4+ championships
Like the bulls, spurs, lakers, Celtics...3 does not = dynasty and 2 losses to go with it
Keep moving those goal posts.
The amount of finals doesn't matter sniffer it's 4+ championships
Like the bulls, spurs, lakers, Celtics...3 does not = dynasty and 2 losses to go with it
Klay, dummy. He's going to come back and not miss a beat.right about what?
Keep moving those goal posts.
Also the 80s Celtics only.won 3, and had I think 3 losses. I guess they weren't a dynasty eitherKeep moving those goal posts.
They made 4. Or are we counting the Warriors 1975 championship too?A dynasty is a dynasty...It's 4 championships or more...The Cavs made 5 finals and won a ring, is that also a dynasty lol
A dynasty is a dynasty...It's 4 championships or more...The Cavs made 5 finals and won a ring, is that also a dynasty lol
what are the criteria?Klay, dummy. He's going to come back and not miss a beat.
Keep moving those goal posts.
Dynasty by your own definition. But whatever helps fit your narrative best.
Celtics didn't win 4 try again.The amount of finals doesn't matter sniffer it's 4+ championships
Like the bulls, spurs, lakers, Celtics...3 does not = dynasty and 2 losses to go with it
The warriors will disappear soon along with their fans
i'm still trying to figure out where the 2nd loss came from...
gotta love Cavs fan...
@lebron23james is Jeffrey Epstein's p*dophile buddyThe warriors will disappear soon along with their fans
Celtics didn't win 4 try again.
They lost to Toronto and they lost to the Cavs...Hope that helps with your math, detective!
ah, you're including the Raps...
well ,they aren't the Cavs, so...
The Celtics didn't win 4...You dumb?
Are you counting overall championships or windows of dominance as your dynasty definition?
I asked you that omgwhat are the criteria?
Take your pick kid, your statement was wrong either way lol