socaljim242
Phantom Marine
Alabama plays at least 1 good-decent OOC game every year. The only difference is we play them on a neutral site. VT was down last year, WVU appears to be down this year, but they were decent teams. Funny enough, we just recently played a school you mentioned - Michigan.
Teams don't take home and home games because they are somehow magically better, because they "aren't pussies", or any of the stupid shit you are talking about. Teams take home and home games because they aren't able to get neutral site games as often. When they are able to get neutral site games, they jump all over it - and for good reason. Just like USC jumped and took the game when it was offered to them.
Of course, because of your ignorant babble, we have to listen to you claim stupid shit like USC was forced to a neutral site game, and who knows what else you just pull out of your ass while ignoring the reality of things.
The reason is simple. It's more money for the team/program, while home and home games usually only give revenue 1 year as the next year it's an away game Neutral sites payout for the year without that effect. AND contrary to your ignorant point of view, the neutral site games also get played in stadiums that aren't otherwise used as often, such as Jerryworld. And it turns out, that despite where the game is being played, or how much you want to pretend like they don't exist because it's a neutral site game the teams that get played are just as good as they are in a home and home.
As for your demanding that a "fact" be acknowledged as if such a thing is the end all be all. We can be an shitposters to if we want, throw out random "facts" and then pretend it meets the assertion. Among intelligent people, it's usually known as a logically fallacy
Example:
USC is a shit school that can't win big games. Yes or No: USC has 0 BCS national championships? Answer the question with yes or no. If you in anyway try to put things in context, if you in anyway try to point out other things, if you in anyway try to point out the significance of the fact, well then you are just putting on a "cowardly display". So are you willing to answer the yes or no question and admit that USC is a shit school that can't win big games?
Whats USCs win percentage in BCS games? How many have they been in? The one they lost to texas did they play like shit? All the other ones did they play like shit? Last time I checked those were big games right? So you're wrong again gump.
As for your we didn't force USC to a neutral game BS. USC took it because your team wouldn't take a home and home and this is the only way to get a game with Bama. How does everyone else who isn't up Sabans ass know this? Because USC doesn't do neutral games other than ones like playing Syracuse at East Rutherford. USC likes playing at places like the shoe because we fans like traveling to these sites. Alabama plays two Tulanes at home and plays a neutral game.