well...i know this is a concept you dont seem to grasp- but- by simple reasoning- if the guys are playing together on the court- that stands to reason they can play different positions - which is one of the main reasons Thompson is valuable- his versatility. Thompson played a ton of center in that Golden State series- as he did through out the entire year- because in todays NBA you can get away with a guy like Thompson playing center- and its a great adnvtange against smaller teams.
Not sure why this is so hard to understand- especially when the lineup that I saw the Cavs go to a ton of the time was Kyrie/Shump/LeBron/Love/Thompson.....to get their 5 best on the court together. Its what a good coach does....a coach thats not stuck in the past.
So now you're paying a backup PF and Center who's 1 dimensional at both positions over $16 million per year? How brilliant.
Face it, you're just trying to justify a basically unjustifiable contract. TT isn't worth what he's being paid. You've already said that. Why are you now trying to justify it?
It's real simple. He's not worth that much money, but because of cap restrictions, he left the Cavs little choice. As I said, the Cavs did the right thing by not letting him force them into an even worse contract. But make no mistake, this is about the lesser of 2 evils, not about it actually being a good contract for the Cavs.
If the Cavs do win the title this year, it will make the contract worth it. But it still won't make it a good contract or make TT worth the money.
It's not entirely different from Kobe's contract. Kobe isn't even close to being worth what he's being paid and hasn't been for at least 4 years. The Lakers gave it to him because of what he's meant to the team and what he means to the financial bottom line. But, even without the injuries, it still wouldn't be a good contract.