cdumler7
Well-Known Member
The question to me though with what type of WR they need to be looking for is can they truly keep going in the same system they have without Brady? I was listening to someone talk about how the Patriots can attack the weakness of a defense and change up what they do week to week mostly because of Brady having complete control of the offense. That is rare to have a QB that probably could write the entire playbook from memory in one sitting.
I do think the Patriots are going to have to change how they view their offense moving forward especially without Brady.
As for the argument of strengthening the OL I guess I would argue against that some. The Chiefs and 49ers did not have a good OL. They had a good enough OL. The top OL's in football were not playoff teams other than maybe 1 or 2 of them. With today's quick strike offense and moving a QB around it becomes more about playmakers than OL. Now if they keep Brady I guess you could have an argument to a point but there were a lot of plays this past year where the blocking held up but no one was getting open.
I do think the Patriots are going to have to change how they view their offense moving forward especially without Brady.
As for the argument of strengthening the OL I guess I would argue against that some. The Chiefs and 49ers did not have a good OL. They had a good enough OL. The top OL's in football were not playoff teams other than maybe 1 or 2 of them. With today's quick strike offense and moving a QB around it becomes more about playmakers than OL. Now if they keep Brady I guess you could have an argument to a point but there were a lot of plays this past year where the blocking held up but no one was getting open.