averagejoe
You fell victim to one of the classic blunders.
At the risk of sounding like BSG, we arent drafting a WR at #9.
Poles will probably trade that pick.
Using the #9 on what-would be a WR3 (in a very deep WR class) for a team who has a history of barely passing enough to keep their WR1 relevant is not practical.
Poles will probably trade that pick.
Using the #9 on what-would be a WR3 (in a very deep WR class) for a team who has a history of barely passing enough to keep their WR1 relevant is not practical.