As is w/o changes another year. Allen is going into his 5th year which I believe is an option year on his rookie contract if the Skins decide to use it. After that decisions will have to be made.
I'm not a big Cam fan, least not anymore. He's been used up much sooner than he should've been imo being the de facto main short yardage RB option every year he's been in the league. That, and he's never really learned to put touch on the ball. Every pass he throws seems like its gotta be 60 mph and on a rope. Last year as ineffective as he was as a passer. It was still his 2nd best year by far when it came to comp %. That doesn't bode well imo going forward with him.
Yes. I have been saying this for two years when people are yelling to sign expensive FAs. That is why signing Ironman at a decent contract for both was big. Every year from here on out one of these guys are going to get paid by someone. I think they need to sign one of the DTs and keep Settle at a lower contract. No clue how they will handle the back to back DEs. All part of the modern game.
My thoughts were KC was a top 10 and occasionally a little higher. No doubt losing Jackson and Garcon and injuries to Reed didn't help. The team didn't win but they were around .500 every year with a terrible D and iffy kicker.
I agree with that, except that I don't think that it would take a "boatload" of picks to get him. In fact I'm still waiting for someone to tell us all why my proposal which is essentially 5 or 6 players for that one great player isn't workable for both teams. Here it is again:
We have to understand that any trade of this type nets Washington Deshaun Watson.... DESHAUN WATSON!! That said, I would not make this trade because you're giving up more than you have to in order to make this trade happen. Eliminate one of the 1's add Ioannidis instead of either of the 1's and I'll make that trade without blinking twice because reality shows that you are actually moving players and picks, not just picks, as the writer suggests. Value for value, that's what it's gonna cost, pay it, an be happy with what you're doing, not what they are with their gains and/or possible poor draft choices with what they got from you.
That's pretty much what I'd call a boatload. With Watson being 25 though and entering into the 'he really really is getting it' stage. I think that boatload can be managed for those couple of years. I like Ioanndis a whole lot though. It wouldn't surprise if when its all said n done in a couple years. If he tyrns out to be the best of all the Skins present interior lineman. Though of all the interior linemen, MI seems most susceptible to injury as well so there's that.
ftw.usatoday.com
My Ad blocker wouldn't allow me to read the article, but with respect to what you wrote about Matt Ioannidis ; I like the dude too, but Washington did pretty well without him this past year. Might he had been a difference maker against some of those big runs this past year, absolutely! I have no credible argument against your point, but my counter is that getting Watson is going to take assets, some are talking about 3 1's to start and I disagree with that.That's pretty much what I'd call a boatload. With Watson being 25 though and entering into the 'he really really is getting it' stage. I think that boatload can be managed for those couple of years. I like Ioanndis a whole lot though. It wouldn't surprise if when its all said n done in a couple years. If he tyrns out to be the best of all the Skins present interior lineman. Though of all the interior linemen, MI seems most susceptible to injury as well so there's that.
Deshaun Watson's QB coach explains how the Texans star managed to get better even as his team fell apart
Houston has actually asked Watson to do more … and he has thrived.
Not a bad offer, so it's 4 for 1 instead of 5 for 1 as I suggested. If you had to sweeten the pot a bit would you be willing to give up a 3rd perhaps another 2nd or some other player? Just trying to see what a 5-1 player trade would look like from you. ( I would eliminate one of those proposed 3rd's to get to 4-1))
Or Ironman may have made a difference when TB ran all over us in the WC game. I still harp on the defensive game plan vs TB which deployed a 4 man rush, too many LB's and way too much zone. Brady stood back there and had his way, pitiful plan JDR!
