I get where you are coming from, but the game is over. The Hawks couldn't run the ball and their O-line didn't give Wilson enough time to throw the ball. Yes I agree with you, there were some bad calls, but the Hawks can't do anything about that now. Game is over and it's on to next weekend.
What was your opinion on the non call on the Jimmy Graham throw at the back of the endzone?Came here to see Seattle fans complaining about refs. Was not disappointed.
I like TY, but I really question whether he's holding up for 16
Seems every game, hes' limping off....They should mix the Williams kid in just in case
Came here to see Seattle fans complaining about refs. Was not disappointed.
It was PI. Seattle got away with one against Adams down the sideline earlier in the game that would have set Green Bay up inside the 15.What was your opinion on the non call on the Jimmy Graham throw at the back of the endzone?
He was sacked 4 times in the first half but still threw for over 300 yards and a TD. Wilson was sacked 2 times and didn't throw a TD.Despite the loss, take satisfaction in knowing Rogers took a beating today. Anyone have stats on his sacks and hits?
Obviously given the OL the Seahawks would have to be a bit innovative. Planned roll outs, extra blockers, etc. Don't give me that bullshit that the Packers secondary is solid.
Seattle gets away with more blatant defensive holding calls than any other team. That's how they roll.It was PI. Seattle got away with one against Adams down the sideline earlier in the game that would have set Green Bay up inside the 15.
How about all the holding the Seahawk's DB's were doing the entire game?
This is something that people have learned to say over the years but let me tell you something...it's stupid. Good teams are supposed to just allow bad reffing to take points off the board and then just overcome it? Bullshit. When refs make horrible calls that either take or give points they are effecting the game. A team shouldn't need to "overcome it". Here is a something you should realize, both Seattle and Green Bay are "good teams". Why should one side have to overcome anything to show they are more "good".
Reffing calls are always subjective so there's no way to get any consensus on this type of stuff, but today the refs called a phantom punch that ejected a starter, they called a ticky tack "block in the back" that took points off the board, and they ignored a mugging against Jimmy Graham that should have given Seattle first and goal at the one. That's 14 points that could have been effected, but the Hawks should "overcome" it because they are a good team? Crazy talk.
The o line is so bad they made the peckers look good. I doubt rogers lasts the whole season. His legs are already bad in the first game. A d tackle out runs him? Yeah, gb fudgepack never complains about the refs.
What happened to the Patriot's defense against a pedestrian QB like Smith?Don't get too excited about that defense just yet, your team just played one of the shittier offenses in the NFC.
If they can shut down Atlanta next week your boys might be on to something.
They have Homer glasses on so they don't see those.
It sounds like you have some sour grapes. Pack have some stud pass rushers and can stop the run very well but your oline is trash and wouldn't even hold hold up at the college level. Rodgers was hurt more from Montgomery than anything. If anything RW will be injured like he was last season with that joke of an oline
Give me a break, Seattle's DB's were holding the entire game.You might be right. I see more stuff that doesn't help my team because I'm biased. That being said, how do you explain the articles on NFL.com, ESPN, and CBS sports taking about how the officiating was questionable today and helped the Packers?