Saban draws comparisons to smoking heaters and the HUNH

[Camfantasy]

 

[charlie42s]

In REAL FOOTBALL(patent pending) Bama never loses.

 

[outofyourmind]

Here's what real football is.

If you don't have 3 running backs right behind the QB then it's not real football.
Fuck passing.
Fuck only having 1 or 2 running backs in there.
I want real man football or go fuck yourself.

If we need new rules to make this happen, then so be it.
Pussies.

 

[WhiteMamba]

^^^ LOL

 

[4down20]

So Auburn and Texas A&M were not playing real football in your opinion?

In my mind Auburn had a great game plan and executed extremely well so scheme's and execution were a huge part of that win. It really doesn't matter if they won with an offense you did or did not approve of but make no mistake it is REAL FOOTBALL.

Not the HUNHNS part.

But again, that isn't what got the wins, so overall it was real football.

 

[trojanfan12]

Wondering if Saban did run the HUNH would he catch shit for it or complimented for running it?

Since it's Saban thinking he catches shit. Didn't he also kill Hoffa?

I'd praise him for it. I don't care for the hunh, but I'm glad that Sark says he's going to implement some of it at USC.

As for Saban, pretty sure you're right. If he didn't personally kill Hoffa, he likely ordered it and knows where the body is.

 

[The Authority]

Is that really an OSU fan making fun of someone's schedule? No Saban would rather play OSU. Get some credit for an easy win. Say what you want but Saban aint no dummy!

He would probably require no rushing yards be allowed by a QB in order to get the win.

Or at least suggest it be "looked into"

 

[Bamabino]

I'm all for the rule that allows do-overs on missed field goals and a turnover just being a penalty and not a change of possession. Nick would be 78-3 over the last 6 years if that were the case and not a paltry 72-9. HUNH has zilch to do with most of the losses.

 

[The Authority]

HUNH has zilch to do with most of the losses.

So Why look into the rule?

 

[4down20]

So Why look into the rule?

 

[Bamabino]

I hope he'll post here at SportsHoopla.

 

[Camfantasy]

I'm all for the rule that allows do-overs on missed field goals and a turnover just being a penalty and not a change of possession. Nick would be 78-3 over the last 6 years if that were the case and not a paltry 72-9. HUNH has zilch to do with most of the losses.

The spread offense does though.

 

[Bamabino]

So Why look into the rule?

Player safety.

 

[4down20]

The spread offense does though.

Yes, but we recruited to adjust to that this year.

 

[Bamabino]

The spread offense does though.

Wrong again 'ol DumplinHumper. Missed FG's and turnovers were the culprits.

 

[Camfantasy]

Yes, but we recruited to adjust to that this year.

Looks pretty similar, size and speed wise, in the front 7 as in years past.

 

[Camfantasy]

Wrong again 'ol DumplinHumper. Missed FG's and turnovers were the culprits.

That's pretty much the culprit for every football team's majority of losses since the beginning of time though.

And chicken n' dumplings are my favorite food.

 

[4down20]

Looks pretty similar, size and speed wise, in the front 7 as in years past.

Look again.

We aren't going to be extremely small, but faster and more athletic.

 

[Camfantasy]

Look again.

We aren't going to be extremely small, but faster and more athletic.

Depends on where some of the guys end up. Like Hand for example.

 

[4down20]

Depends on where some of the guys end up. Like Hand for example.

No way he ends up anywhere but DE. Our LB is full up and we don't need help there.

I've heard rumors we may be entertaining a 4-3 instead of 3-4, but no clue if that is correct. I thought it was kind of odd because you can always throw a LB on the line and get the 4-3 look.