j_y19
ESPN Cast Off
And what exactly is the difference, dean?You already know the difference between Carr and KC.
And what exactly is the difference, dean?You already know the difference between Carr and KC.
And what exactly is the difference, dean?
Another book report filled with juvenile insults by Breed... where to start???
point one.
I freely admit Kirk was NOT good enough to overcome a historically bad defense Never said or implied he was.
Point two
Do I really need to pull up the stats of how our defense was historically bad when compared to the history of the team, hell to a degree to the NFL. The team reaction should be enough to prove just how bad even the front office thought this defense was.
6 of 10 draft picks, and the first three went to defense. And yet you think the real issue was the QB. We added two D-lineman an ILB, and a safety via free agency. And yet I need to explain exactly how bad this defense was.
Point three... when did I lie?? I simply stated that alot of the we cant sign Kirk folks tend to twist things to fit their argument. And you sir are a prime example. So you want to question my fan status because I think its rather stupid to risk going back into a situation where we most likely need to trade up for a QB out of desperation again?? You play the juvenile name game because I happen to think that the team would be better off rolling with a QB that has been better than anything we have had in 20 years. And that makes me a fan boy nut hugger because I think the team is better off not going back into the abyss??
I await your next master thesis.
Point 1) If we should ever meet face to face. There will be a part of me that will be utterly shocked if Kirk's nut-sack isn't permanently imprinted on your chin.
Point 2) Good grief, Buttercup. Try and keep up, OK. No, I don't need you to show me shit about the Skins defense. I already explained to you why I ask you 'How so?' far as the defense went. In fact, the explanation is in the post that you quoted to respond to me with your post that I'm now quoting. Fuckin dense dense dense.
Point 3) Post#1432 on page 72 is where you both embarrassed and revealed yourself.
Fair enough, Rodgers did sign an extension in 2008. Barely before he played a game. Green Bay rolled the dice and hit gold. Guess I should have done my homework before shooting off at the mouth. I couldn't find alot of details, but I found it interesting that they didn't even quite guarantee 2X his yearly pay, $11 mill APY, $20 mill guaranteed. My how things have changed...
I guess you are right in the sense that teams will pay for "hope", but still KC was no more than an average starter at that point. No better resume than most of the players below him. The only thing, as you say, there was still hope. He had hardly had time to fail yet.
Well, obviously many of us disagree on what market value is. I would say the Luck contract would be the ceiling based on what he has accomplished. If he didn't accept it, that would be unreasonable.
And I think if he left the highest paid players salary on the table, it would completely wreak of greed. In some ways I think it would hurt his image, but he wouldn't be any different than most NFL players, so I see your point.
..And I'm glad to see you at least wouldn't be rooting for him HTTR
“I think that bothers those fanboys so flipping badly that they cannot move past it. And that’s coloring their evaluation. They can’t do the 16-game sample. They can’t include the Green Bay game. They can’t include how good he was against Philadelphia, leading them back with the late charge, the Dallas game where they couldn’t stop anybody on two-and-a-half days’ rest, where he was awesome, and Jordan Reed played hurt and he was awesome. They cannot get past that Giants game in terms of their evaluation.”
You and the other KC nut-huggers are the fan-boys doofus. We ABCs as you have dubbed us are the haters.
GB game was a great game for Kirk passing-wise, Rob Kelly rushing-wise and for the offense all around. Including McVay's very balanced play calling that night. 30 passes/30 runs.............#whenskinsruntheywin
Which Eagles game would that be?
The one where Kirk threw a pick 6 and the KO team gave up a KO ret TD which accounted for 2 of the 3 scores for the Eagels that day. While Matt Jones lead the Skins offense with 135 yards of the 230 rushing yards the Skins put up. Another great and balanced game plan called by McVay. 34 pass/33 runs Or.........
The one where Kirk threw the other pick 6 turning an 8 point 4th qt lead into a 2 point 4th qt lead. That was still anybody's game till Ryan Kerrigan's strip/sack and TM's fumble recovery sealing the victory? The Eagles converted a whole lotta 3rd dn that night. Giving them a huge edge in top 13 minutes or so. But the Skins to their credit didn't panic and stayed with another well balanced game plan. 21 passes/23 runs.
quaerite auxilium
Demander de l'aide
Hilfe suchen
Busca ayuda
"If" Kirk gets paid which I think he will (Highest paid QB in NFL) like it or not. I will expect nothing but Superbowls!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
HTTR!
"If" Kirk gets paid which I think he will (Highest paid QB in NFL) like it or not. I will expect nothing but Superbowls!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
HTTR!
What you proved is, you are capable of cheery picking a couple of bad games or results and proclaiming
See.. this is who he really is.
What neither of you have the balls to say is, you dont care how Kirk finishes this year, or how he did last year. VT passed judgement on him already and deemed the team would be better off with one of these rookies. So to for that matter have you
And what exactly is the difference, dean?
cherry pick? I gave you a lot of examples. To say what? I told you im ok with have KC here on the Luck deal. what more do you want?
younger players just get paid more b/c of potential. It happens at every position.
If he left with the highest paid players salary on the table, I am pretty sure that would state the opposite. He just doesn't want to be here.
Maybe so. Then that would further prove that he is playing this bullshit game and publicly saying he was willing to negotiate when in fact he wasn't, he just wants to be traded. Slice it how you want, but that is a shady fucking liar in my world. It is ethically not right. That would further prove that he was toying with our emotions and that we could have traded his ass for a couple of first rounders if we would have known this. But he and his agent would know what they are doing. They are probably hoping to make it to FA after this next season where not only will they completely cash in, but he can pick and choose where he goes as well.