I believe it was Hammer yesterday that brought up a statement that said the Dodgers would have to pay for Ethier's salary if he left, does anyone think that for the money the new owners have paid already, they won't bite on that bullet? Especially if another starting pitcher or 3rd baseball is also in the discussion.:confused2:
If the Dodgers believe they can win the division this season, they need to be on the phone to Josh Byrnes asking what it would take to complete an Ethier-for-Headley trade. If they don't believe they can win the division (very doubtful they think this so early) then they should try to get out from under Ethier and Crawford's salaries as cheaply as possible and maybe even get a little something in return.
The most likely scenario to me (not surprisingly) is Ethier gets traded to a contender for the best offer and if they can get a really good return for Crawford, they might look at that after missing the playoffs is a foregone conclusion. Colletti's job depends on winning now so I say the second that playoff hopes are dead they tell him to go home, then be prepared to hire their own man who aligns with their vision of youth and strong farm system.
However it works out, there will be at least one major trade from the Dodgers before the deadline, don't you think? And maybe even a blockbuster?