politics thread

[Toadman005]

Define "leftist"

Radical progressives. Anarchists, socialists/communists, third wave Femenists, identity politic tribalists, militant atheists, the LGBQTA community, environmental zealots, 95% of the MSM, etc.

 

[Stymietee]

renewable energy, more efficient cars, planes and other forms of transportation always will have one major enemy in this country.

Profits.

The power company doesnt get upset when three houses out of 3000 switch to solar. But when builders started talking about green, off grid housing, they got their panties in a major wedgie.

The other interesting thing is the number of people left and right who don't want intrusion in their lives. Now I could be wrong but doesn't "off grid" provide a bit of that.

 

[Toadman005]

Ready to get smacked around again?

That's not how the world and development works. Replacing everything tomorrow is a weak assed argument in that it presents a premise that isn't factually based. In effect you can't replace it all tomorrow, it will take years, therefore there NOTHING that sets us back 200 years. Gee, fucking you up with your own words is kinda fun, want to keep going?

Which is why I said hypothetically. Can you read? Are you capable? Honest question, because you're acting extremely arrogant for someone failing to make a compelling case/argument. You've straw-manned, incorrectly assumed and surmised. And regardless, you're still missing the point of the question, which is to illustrate that the New Green Deal would be ineffective and yet, hurt America greatly. I only explain that to you because I honestly don't think you've shown yourself capable of figuring it out on your own.[/QUOTE]

 

[Sharkinva]

The other interesting thing is the number of people left and right who don't want intrusion in their lives. Now I could be wrong but doesn't "off grid" provide a bit of that.

Dude you know where i live, the moment Solar becomes realistically affordable without having to go through all the hoops involved.... IM getting a big assed solar panel installed. But as it stands now, the cost is as much as my power bill because they want you to finance the damn system.

 

[Stymietee]

Radical progressives. Anarchists, socialists/communists, third wave Femenists, identity politic tribalists, militant atheists, the LGBQTA community, environmental zealots, 95% of the MSM, etc.[/QUOTE]

Check out the highlighted/underlined parts, I hope that you know that a few of these includes you!

 

[Toadman005]

Wrong, though I did work in the media for just under 14 years, including The New York Times. And I hope that trash rag goes under.

 

[skinsdad62]

I understand what someone actually says, what's currently accepted, and what you actually wrote here in context. While there are a number of alternative acronymic uses of MSM, none fit your use of it other than Mainstream Media. Clearly it is you are misusing the term, or feebly attempting to redefine it to fit some other BS narrative.

BTW: I used Wikipedia because it appears that anything above basic understanding of everyday usage, is a problem here.

Well start your crusade with the rest of the world .

 

[skinsdad62]

"Holy shit!" how appropriate!

I already said that earlier what part of Sean hannity is the mouth piece of trump didnt you understand. And this is the 2nd time today DGF got amnesia

 

[skinsdad62]

Yes, I know, and I also know that immigration is an issue that historically started long before anyone alive was around to concern themselves about. C'mon man, don't be like some of these youngsters today who seem take the position that nothing happened until they were born.

Early American Immigration Policies | USCIS
www.uscis.gov › … › Our History › Agency History
Early American Immigration Policies. Americans encouraged relatively free and open immigration during the 18th and early 19th centuries, and rarely questioned that policy until the late 1800s. After certain states passed immigration laws following the Civil War, the Supreme Court in 1875 declared regulation of immigration a federal responsibility.

And acting like nothing changed

 

[skinsdad62]

Yes, I know, and I also know that immigration is an issue that historically started long before anyone alive was around to concern themselves about. C'mon man, don't be like some of these youngsters today who seem take the position that nothing happened until they were born.

Early American Immigration Policies | USCIS
www.uscis.gov › … › Our History › Agency History
Early American Immigration Policies. Americans encouraged relatively free and open immigration during the 18th and early 19th centuries, and rarely questioned that policy until the late 1800s. After certain states passed immigration laws following the Civil War, the Supreme Court in 1875 declared regulation of immigration a federal

And why do we act like nothing has changed . I have put up numbers showing that

 

[Stymietee]

Which is why I said hypothetically. Can you read? Are you capable? Honest question, because you're acting extremely arrogant for someone failing to make a compelling case/argument. You've straw-manned, incorrectly assumed and surmised. And regardless, you're still missing the point of the question, which is to illustrate that the New Green Deal would be ineffective and yet, hurt America greatly. I only explain that to you because I honestly don't think you've shown yourself capable of figuring it out on your own.

[/QUOTE]

This is getting easier by the moment, so let's play your minor word game. "Hypotheticals" assume what follows as fact, since replacing fossil fuel energy wouldn't be done over night and in time done in a manner that doesn't set the country back "200 years" then your question falls into absurdity.

Now, there an strict rule here that forbids name calling, however, if you want to do so by PM here, I'll gladly oblige you in a give and take in calling each other all manner of dumb assed MF's. It's a waste of time, but my hood card is still up to date!

 

[Sharkinva]

And acting like nothing changed

things have changed. Instead of Asians, Eastern Europeans and Italians being the undesirables in the immigration game. Now its people from South of the Border, Africa or any of DJTs designated Shithole countries. But the same playbook is being used.

 

[Toadman005]

things have changed. Instead of Asians, Eastern Europeans and Italians being the undesirables in the immigration game. Now its people from South of the Border, Africa or any of DJTs designated Shithole countries. But the same playbook is being used.

Don't want shithold conditions coming here. Don't care if that offends.

 

[skinsdad62]

Here's an idea.. how about we take all of those scared assed folks who don't believe in science and are afraid of what someone is telling them about the southern border and move them to Mexico!, There two problems solved with one answer.

How about the actual so called science actually get a doom and gloom prediction right ?

 

[skinsdad62]

things have changed. Instead of Asians, Eastern Europeans and Italians being the undesirables in the immigration game. Now its people from South of the Border, Africa or any of DJTs designated Shithole countries. But the same playbook is being used.

That statement is laughable as I showed above

 

[Toadman005]

This is getting easier by the moment, so let's play your minor word game. "Hypotheticals" assume what follows as fact, since replacing fossil fuel energy wouldn't be done over night and in time done in a manner that doesn't set the country back "200 years" then your question falls into absurdity.

Now, there an strict rule here that forbids name calling, however, if you want to do so by PM here, I'll gladly oblige you in a give and take in calling each other all manner of dumb assed MF's. It's a waste of time, but my hood card is still up to date![/QUOTE]
Sigh. The Green Deal called for and end within 12 years. Not overnight, but even IF we tried living up to it (and there's no reason we should ever want to), that's woefully unrealistic and would cripple our country. If you want to squabble over arbitrary things like wether it'd be 200 years or not, I'll concede the issue to move on to the overall point- the racist and insane power grab that masks itself in environmentalism Green Deal would greatly devastate our country, and it would ultimately (as the rest of the world wouldn't follow suit) be futile. Even IF hypothetically, the entire world agreed to it, it's effects would be negligible.

You seem itching to call me names. And hood cards and online insults sort of run counter to each other I would think. But, then again, I avoid shitty hoods, so, I can say what the card does or does not entail.

 

[Stymietee]

Dude you know where i live, the moment Solar becomes realistically affordable without having to go through all the hoops involved.... IM getting a big assed solar panel installed. But as it stands now, the cost is as much as my power bill because they want you to finance the damn system.

Outstanding! Eventually the prices will go down and keep an eye on Elon Musk who owns Solar City. I hear that he's almost perfected the home storage unit. That would be huge in the industry!

 

[Stymietee]

Well start your crusade with the rest of the world .[/QUOTE

How about the actual so called science actually get a doom and gloom prediction right ?

So-called science, Really?

 

[Stymietee]

Geez, that was fun.

 

[Sharkinva]

I always find it odd that people who believe in God, think that mankind does not have the ability to damage the planet enough where mankind wont be able to survive on the planet.

I mean its not like Man has not been the deciding factor in making other species extinct on this planet.