sure dumler...it's me.
How do you spin 9 touchdowns and 17 interceptions? That's terrible.
You spin it by adding in Osweiler's numbers which makes horriawful look instead just awful. 19:23 is more "reasonable."
Wow.
Oh what bullshit. Ron probably should welcome the opportunity to watch film and exploit every last weakness he can find over the course of an offseason. But nope.
just cause you lead the league all summer dosen't mean you should pile on. Some fans consider other things like maybe, the decisions made play after play and those decisions when and where to throw a football. Little shit, the game inside the game.
Even if you put Osweiler's numbers in there, Denver still threw more interceptions than touchdowns. The only other team that managed that was the Cowboys, and I think we all know how bad their qb situation was last year.
Maybe- it'd be very easy to argue it's reasonable to expect Siemian to be as bad or worse than last year's QB's is the only thing. I don't think it's hard to see why people are skeptical. I definitely thought it'd be worse with Sanchez but idk about Siemian to be honest.
Decisions are only as good as your ability to take advantage of them. Manning knew how to make the right reads, but his body frequently didn't allow him to place the ball where he wanted to. And defenses knew he was not a threat on anything deep outside the numbers. The only game he consistently hit long passes was against Green Bay, and look what happened: the Broncos blew them out.
That's totally fair. Who knows what kind of qb Siemian will be? He could suck. He could be ok. He could be really good (although I seriously doubt that happens). I've got no problem with being skeptical.
10,750 times since June
Did we keep you from discussing all of the other topics during the interminable offseason?
