I feel like this is the scene from Moneyball where the scouts are saying that one prospect will be good because he looks like a pro player while another one won't be good because he has an ugly girlfriend.
I am not arguing that he's a good midrange scorer (although the stats certainly don't show that he is a bad one. they show he's an efficient, low usage midrange player).
I am arguing that he doesn't shoot from midrange because shooting from 3 and at the rim has better value. And that even if he turns out to be bad from midrange, then it is the least important tier of the 3.
Realizing that a midrange shot has the least value should be a positive trait and not looked upon negatively. Steph Curry shot 5 times more 3's than he did midrange shots. There is simply little value in those type of shots when you shoot 40% from 3 and 75% from the rim. What did you want him to do? Pass up a better shot selection for a poorer one?
And it's not like I dislike Fultz or even think the trade was bad. I think Fultz is very good and a great fit for the current team.
I think it is because it is a shot he has difficulty getting off. The very low number of mid range shots taken is major alarm for me. To me it shows it is a shot that he has difficulty getting off. I could be wrong but that is how I interpret it. A total of 25 shots taken from mid range is ridiculously low. He does get a lot of layups.......Sixers do not need him making all those layups. His shot chart shows that he is a poor fit for the Sixers
As far as your last statement, I think you're dead wrong. And you especially don't want a player that shoots well from the outside and is a great passer/creator to settle for a midrange shot. You want him to take 3's, get to the rim, or create better opportunities than midrange shots.
When you shoot 75% at the rim and 40% from 3, then yes... midrange shots are a terrible decision.Your argument makes no sense to me. It is as if you are saying that layups and 3 pointers are the only shots that matter and that is ridiculous.
On twitter, this pic was dubbed Mount Trustmore. I like it. And damn Embiid is gigantic.
![]()
When you shoot 75% at the rim and 40% from 3, then yes... midrange shots are a terrible decision.
Have you looked at the shot breakdown of good shooters/playmakers? Curry, Klay, Kyrie, etc?
It's even a worse decision when you can pass and create. The idea is to take the shot with the best expected value. Those are shots at the rim (because of the higher percentage) or a lightly contested 3 (because it doesn't have a much worse percentage than a 15-20 footer and is worth more points). Take a look at the shooting percentages of Lonzo's teammates. It's because he puts everybody in a position to take a highly efficient shot.
Not that I disagree, but Covington may be one of the most underrated players in the league and a good fit in the starting-5.Nice. Although, one of these players is not like the others.
Rumors that the Suns are taking Isaac at #4. Boston may be leaning towards Tatum at #3.
Jackson or Fox could fall out of the top 5.
If Ball fall past the Lakers, then Ainge is a genius.Or possibly Ball, even.
Damn, I go to work and I miss all the good bball chatter![]()
If Ball fall past the Lakers, then Ainge is a genius.
I don't think Ainge would want Ball. He needs SG, and forwards. I think he trades down again for more picks to trade for George or Butler.
Anyway, the rumor is that the sixers may be involved in a 3 way deal with Indy, cleve, and we wind up with Kevin Love. Do you like that?
When you shoot 75% at the rim and 40% from 3, then yes... midrange shots are a terrible decision.
Have you looked at the shot breakdown of good shooters/playmakers? Curry, Klay, Kyrie, etc?
It's even a worse decision when you can pass and create. The idea is to take the shot with the best expected value. Those are shots at the rim (because of the higher percentage) or a lightly contested 3 (because it doesn't have a much worse percentage than a 15-20 footer and is worth more points). Take a look at the shooting percentages of Lonzo's teammates. It's because he puts everybody in a position to take a highly efficient shot.