- Thread starter
- #1,041
Kind of crazy to think so. Who would we look at? I would hope it would be Young
Somehow I highly highly highly doubt this to be true.
Kind of crazy to think so. Who would we look at? I would hope it would be Young
Even though Von severely underperformed this year I think it’s 100% the wrong move to take another pash rusher in the first round when Chubb is coming back. Unless we trade Von this offseason for a top tier CB, DT, WR, or multiple First rounders I don’t think we would even look at Young.
I almost did not post this him being a kicker and all
I found some pretty good article on the new CBA, below are the highlights:
I am sure I missed some things so below is the link:
- Owners want the option for the 17th game.
- Player salaries need to be worked out if/when the 17th game added.
- Owners offering up 48.5% of revenue
- Owners keeping a second bye week in their pocket as bargaining chip, but the owners want the second bye week because with the 17th game they now get 19 weeks of regular season football.
- Players want 50/50 split of revenue.
- Players want minimum salaries raised to give more to mid-level players.
The CBA is hugely important to NFL football in 2021 and beyond - here’s a quick update
Oh the other thing is the NFLPA leadership changes with the new league year. If a new CBA is not agreed to prior to March 28th then a work stoppage increases in likelihood.
A good read FA and some FA targets and Money Available
Pat Bowlen had a child (girl born in 1988) out of wedlock so add kid #8 to family feud.
As far as the CXBA goes, there is a bit of a problem. It's primarily in each individual's head.
The NFLPA is saying, "The players are the product. Without them, there is no product."
The owners are saying, "The players are a major piece of the product. Without stadiums and owners to maintain them, there is no platform for the product."
As far as salaries go, eventually there will be no more room to expand anyone's salary. As dangerous as it may be to play in the NFL, at some unknown point, paying more money will be out of the question. What needs to happen is to guarantee every contract. Cutting a guy after two or three years is no longer an option. Bonuses will be part of the total package and the cap will never have "dead" money. The cap will also have to have a 90% minimum to prevent butthole owners from stashing cash in their own pockets.
The cap is already at something like 93% of cap has to be spent over a 3-year period. So you can have one year where you hold onto quite a bit of cap but that is it. AT some point it still has to be spent. 2011 was the last time they allowed owners to hold onto money like that and some of them even got busted for it.
As for them eventually running out of money. Right now this is why they are trying to expand to other countries and make the NFL a world wide sport. IF they can do that then I don't see the money running out any time soon. Pat Bowlen was the first owner to really suggest expanding the league and encouraging the league to play in other countries. That is starting to pay off as Europe seems to be growing in their love of the NFL quite a bit. Heck I was on a show not too long ago that aired in 3 European Countries talking about the Broncos. Kind of cool other than it was translated into other languages so couldn't understand the finished product.