Screamin12th
Well-Known Member
"Releasing Adams after June 1 would save Seattle $8.4 million in cap space, per Over the Cap. Such a move would result in $9.7 million in dead money, with Adams receiving $2.56 million in guaranteed salary. That's a significant difference from the $23.9 million in dead money as a pre-June 1 cut."
They are talking about using him as a in the box linebacker more often. Some of you might like that because that fits his skill set better. There is one BIG issue with that. How many under sized Linebackers make 18 million a year? Then you got Pete and John who for some reason hate to admit when they are wrong and carry /keep guys longer than they should even when it's a detriment to the team.
Fann: Seahawks cutting Jamal Adams is an option, albeit unlikely
Jamal Adams hasn't been healthy much since signing a big contract. Joe Fann looks at the possibility of the Seahawks moving on from him.
sports.mynorthwest.com
They are talking about using him as a in the box linebacker more often. Some of you might like that because that fits his skill set better. There is one BIG issue with that. How many under sized Linebackers make 18 million a year? Then you got Pete and John who for some reason hate to admit when they are wrong and carry /keep guys longer than they should even when it's a detriment to the team.
Last edited: