- Thread starter
- #181
Jordan23
Well-Known Member
Yeah but takes a lot more than that to win MVP.I've heard that he's pretty good running with the ball too.
Yeah but takes a lot more than that to win MVP.I've heard that he's pretty good running with the ball too.
Pffft. Yeah lamar is too retarded to use deebo, mccaffrey and the rest of the gang. Kittle would probably have 1200 yards. The offense is perfect for any QB to walk into.Both would be worse off.
I thought the fact that he'll probably have another 1000 yards rushing might be worth mentioning, also the pressure that puts on the entire defense.
The 49ers offense is more about quick decisions, precision, and timing than the Ravens offense. Jackson's strengths are his physicality and letting plays develop. It's not a natural mesh and changing the system to accommodate Jackson might not suit the skill players already there. It would be a similar story in Baltimore. Letting plays develop and running more often probably wouldn't suit Purdy and a more technical offense might not suit their current skill players. It's not a slur on anyone's skills or abilities.Hard to imagine how the Niners would be worse off with Lamar given the weapons on that offense, but your opinion is as valid as mine.
The 49ers offense is more about quick decisions, precision, and timing than the Ravens offense. Jackson's strengths are his physicality and letting plays develop. It's not a natural mesh and changing the system to accommodate Jackson might not suit the skill players already there. It would be a similar story in Baltimore. Letting plays develop and running more often probably wouldn't suit Purdy and a more technical offense might not suit their current skill players. It's not a slur on anyone's skills or abilities.
We have different way of looking at it I guess because I think that players make plays, not schemes and styles. I don't think there would be a problem for Lamar to mesh with the likes of CMC, Deebo, Kittle & Aiyuk as options.
The 49ers offense is more about quick decisions, precision, and timing than the Ravens offense. Jackson's strengths are his physicality and letting plays develop. It's not a natural mesh and changing the system to accommodate Jackson might not suit the skill players already there. It would be a similar story in Baltimore. Letting plays develop and running more often probably wouldn't suit Purdy and a more technical offense might not suit their current skill players. It's not a slur on anyone's skills or abilities.
Pffft. Yeah lamar is too retarded to use deebo, mccaffrey and the rest of the gang. Kittle would probably have 1200 yards. The offense is perfect for any QB to walk into.
Purdy would really be an MVP if he could do it with the bunch in Baltimore.
Jackson is a high quality QB. Shanahan is a top quality offensive coach. The other players are high quality. Doesn't mean it would all mesh. Dream teams fall apart. Has anyone ever praised Jackson for his ability to play to his teammates' strengths? Personally i'm not convinced he would raise what is already a very high bar. Being consistently good but unspectacular is an underrated trait.I think with Lamaar on that team,wrs may even be a little more open for the fact of LJs ability to run.....Purdy is not running, defenses know this
while I personally agree with this.McCaffrey.........Purdy.......McCaffrey without a doubt.
Purdy,not taking anything away from him,but do you guys think he could go to another team and automatically make them better??
We all know CMC had put up big nummbers for Carolina,but could BP do the same for other teams....??
Ask yourselves who would rather have for your own team:
Lamaar or BP??
Mahomes or BP??
Hurts or BP??
Dak or BP??
Josh Allen or BP??
Tua or BP??
Joe Burrow or BP??
CJ or BP??(actually its a fair question)
Herbert or BP??
Justin Fields or BP??( fair question)
Trevor Lawrence or BP??
Kirk Cousins or BP??
Staff or Purdy??
Out of those 13 qbs you could say all 13 or atleast 11 of them you would take over BP.........
BP would not raise those team level at all,but the 9ers would not miss a beat with those qbs ......
THen ask yourself how many rbs you would take over CMC......the answer is zero.
That should give you who the mvp award should go to.......
Jackson is a high quality QB. Shanahan is a top quality offensive coach. The other players are high quality. Doesn't mean it would all mesh. Dream teams fall apart. Has anyone ever praised Jackson for his ability to play to his teammates' strengths? Personally i'm not convinced he would raise what is already a very high bar. Being consistently good but unspectacular is an underrated trait.
while I personally agree with this.
It isnt the world we live in.
Believe the question is who we think will win it.
Not who should win it.
because if that were the case. QBs would win it a lot less.