- Thread starter
- #41
Nosferatu
Faith, Hope & Love
See, this is what gets me... All the stats in the world say ALlen's top 3 seasons were better... But because you SAW Campbell, and allen Play, you have a bias because Campbell impressed you...
See this is what bothers me, you think using AV or total yards makes Allen better. Allen was used way more receiving thats the only thing that makes him even close in yards. Campbell ran for 5000 yards in 3 years and took the league by storm, you'd need to use 6 seasons for Allen to get to 5000 yard. Earl could have caught more balls out of the backfield that just simply wasnt the best way to use him.
Bias? No, Campbell was a better RUNNING BACK thats a fact not my opinion. If you want to talk about whos was the better reciever then you have something but running back to me means running back, someone you hand the ball to and block for and Campbell blows Allen out of the freakin water as a running back. Impressed me, lolzzz what a DA...