- Thread starter
- #14,681
as well as a 3 and swap of 4 for 5.According to Schefter trade has 3 1sts going to Houston
while that is funny I'd say thanks but no thanks.
may want to replace wiggy with me on that.
BingoChristian Laettner
was no doubt only reason not to pick Browns was weather....I wonder if players put the full court press on him?I don’t know.
Between the Saints, Falcons and Browns, Cleveland has the best overall roster AND they could use Baker as part of the package to get Watson.
Maybe Watson realized that the situations in ATL and NO weren’t quite as good as he thought?
It is a risk that could blow up terribly, but I like Cleveland’s chances of winning a Super Bowl a lot better with Watson than with Baker.
I don’t know.
Between the Saints, Falcons and Browns, Cleveland has the best overall roster AND they could use Baker as part of the package to get Watson.
Maybe Watson realized that the situations in ATL and NO weren’t quite as good as he thought?
It is a risk that could blow up terribly, but I like Cleveland’s chances of winning a Super Bowl a lot better with Watson than with Baker.
How are you feeling about this? I recall you on the Rivals board in an attempt to defend the Cleveland front office that passed on Watson making the argument that Baker was comparable.was no doubt only reason not to pick Browns was weather....I wonder if players put the full court press on him?
and, yes, no doubt we are screwed if it doesn't work out. People say this a lot and are exaggerating but we really would be set back 3-5 years.
We got JuJu, y'all...!!!
I’m not so sure that he gets another jobWhen does Antonio Brown sign with the Browns?
Yup. Can't just gang up on Hill and Kelce anymore...Solid move. Gives them something different at WR.
Yup. Can't just gang up on Hill and Kelce anymore...
...and here's how the Browns got back on his radar