- Thread starter
- #58,461
Lol I'm good. Still got Drue Tranquil and Nick Bolton. Leo Chenal is there too...
Lol I'm good. Still got Drue Tranquil and Nick Bolton. Leo Chenal is there too...
We're good at LB. I'm more concerned with CB, WR, and OT...
Good speed and instincts. Plays sideline to sideline. Decent tackler. So you definitely got a good one. Honestly y'all got him on the cheap...lol no im asking you if he is any good? Don't know much about him
Want to know if this is solid pick up or a shitty one
the one reason I would not draft WR is that you have Cooper, Jeudy and Moore - who will get the majority of the playing time. We need to determine if Tillman and/or Bell will develop- and with another WR in the mix I think it would be hard to get them reps.My vote would be go corner and trade Newsome. Or go WR because at minimum Jeudy sucks and we move on or we bite the bullet and move from Coop (which would suck)
the one reason I would not draft WR is that you have Cooper, Jeudy and Moore - who will get the majority of the playing time. We need to determine if Tillman and/or Bell will develop- and with another WR in the mix I think it would be hard to get them reps.
It is tough though- since all of Cooper, Jeudy and Moore have issues that may prevent their resigning (from age, to productivity, etc.)- and if we dont get a guy in right now to get in the system- will it be impossible to rebuild the whole WR core on the fly next offseason?
They will at least have their full slate of picks next year which will be nice. I think the Browns media, especially radio people have lost their minds with so little draft coverage to talk about in the offseason the last couple years. lol.
Trent Dilfer has a SB ring. Nobody in their right mind would say he is a better QB than KC....and the difference between the two is one playoff win.
Trent Dilfer has a SB ring. Nobody in their right mind would say he is a better QB than KC.
22 starters on offense and defense are responsible for a team's record. Not just 1.
The NFC South is wide open and KC is automatically the best QB in the division.It's an excessive amount of money to pay for a QB that hasn't ever taken a team anywhere in the postseason, but that's the league today.
Griffin was not the lesser QB, he was the more injured QB.
It's an excessive amount of money to pay for a QB that hasn't ever taken a team anywhere in the postseason, but that's the league today.
Griffin was not the lesser QB, he was the more injured QB.
The NFC South is wide open and KC is automatically the best QB in the division.
He was the lesser QB.
Yes he got hurt.
But as the case often with young QBs, give the league time to adjust and they often do.
RG3 was never as good as he performed during that stretch of his rookie season.
Because he was never the same after the injury.
Exactly.He was the lesser QB.
Yes he got hurt.
But as the case often with young QBs, give the league time to adjust and they often do.
RG3 was never as good as he performed during that stretch of his rookie season.
Dude, I watched every game.
It was more than the injury.
The Redskins at the time were running a pretty low level college scheme that worked for awhile because it was different.
Yes he wasn’t as fast after the injury.
But he was never a good thrower of the football once defenses no longer had to account for him being the most dangerous runner on the field.
He would have regressed with or without injury.