- Thread starter
- #221
Cedrique
Well-Known Member
Yeah I agree. The 6 years makes it a decent risk. I don't know how those medical exams work but one thing that I guess could go wrong is if the thing that the Giants and Mets found is something that could lead him to be suspended down the road. (but I'm not sure if that's possible. That might be something they would have to disclose).I think the Twins ended up being pretty big winners here. Worst case is they are stuck with a $33m aav albatross for up to 6 years (if he blows out his leg this ST and immediately retires due to injury). But that’s it. If he continues to play, then some options (??) activate for years 7-10. But the Twins are not on the hook for those additional years unless he shows to be somewhat durable in the first 6 seasons of the contract.
The Giants and Mutts walked away because they would have been on the hook for 13 (Giants) or 12 (Mutts) years, regardless.