• Have something to say? Register Now! and be posting in minutes!

Mike Wallace to SF?

BINGO

New Member
10,815
0
0
Joined
Aug 3, 2011
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Latest on the Wallace decision
11:44 AM ET
Mike Wallace | Steelers | Interested: 49ers?, Patriots?

In spite of the fact that they leave themselves open to other teams taking advantage of a rare opportunity, it seems that the Pittsburgh Steelers will not be using their franchise tag on wide receiver Mike Wallace this offseason. But that doesn't mean we should expect a flurry of teams trying to sign him to an RFA offer sheet, either.

Ed Bouchette of the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette: "It seems to me that Mike Wallace will remain with the Steelers for at least one year because no other team will sign him to a contract. Why would another team pay all that money in order to convince him to sign AND give their first-round pick to the Steelers?"

Pete Prisco of CBS Sports: "Don't count on Steelers receiver Mike Wallace going anywhere. The Steelers, who are trying to clear cap room to keep him, will not let him go. The idea that some team will sign him to an offer sheet that the Steelers won't match isn't going to happen. For one, it will cost a lot more to pay Mike Wallace than it would for a first-round receiver. Two, the Steelers would match -- so all you would be doing is their negotiating."

Even so, we simply can't rule out a team making a play for Wallace, especially considering that there are two particular clubs with low first-round picks that are in need of a performer of Wallace's ilk at WR:

- Tim Kavanagh​


Jamison Hensley
Is he worth the No. 30 or 31 pick?
"The Ravens are out, and the Bengals would surprise me at this point, too. But I wouldn't rule out teams desperate for a deep threat like the Patriots and 49ers. New England coach Bill Belichick is always thinking outside the box."
 

grayghost668

Gun Control,,,,not likely
28,648
3
38
Joined
Apr 11, 2011
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Pitt is working hard to keep Wallace,I wouldn't go getting my hopes up on him jumping to the 49ers
 

1911Alaska

New Member
444
0
0
Joined
Sep 27, 2011
Location
Alaska
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I think we should go for it if the price is right.

When they tender a player that means if we sign him we owe the Steeler's are first round pick correct? If this is true I say lets do it. I think he is easily better then any player that we might draft at the 30th spot.
 

calison3

New Member
54
0
0
Joined
Aug 3, 2011
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Whole thread about Wallace
http://www.sportshoopla.com/forums/san-francisco-49ers/63690-mike-wallace-sf.html[/URL]
 

Ray_Dogg

Troll Hunter
7,805
0
0
Joined
Dec 2, 2010
Location
Bay Area
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
So Pitt is supposedly only about $3 mill under the cap and they obviously opted not to place the franchise tag on Wallace. The franchise tag would have cost them $9.4 million. What team is going to call their bluff and offer Wallace near franchise money and risk giving up the first round pick?
 

SRPnVA

New Member
567
0
0
Joined
Aug 4, 2011
Location
Ashburn, VA
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
If we make an offer and they match it do we get the pick back? I would gladly exchange the 30th pick for signing Wallace. Rather than waiting three years for a receiver to develop we'd be getting a player in his prime. If we draft Sanu or Hill we'd still be calling Crabtree our #1 receiver unless we sign VJax, Johnson, or Colston.
 

tzill

Lefty 99
26,945
7,802
533
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Location
San Francisco
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,064.42
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
If we make an offer and they match it do we get the pick back? I would gladly exchange the 30th pick for signing Wallace. Rather than waiting three years for a receiver to develop we'd be getting a player in his prime. If we draft Sanu or Hill we'd still be calling Crabtree our #1 receiver unless we sign VJax, Johnson, or Colston.

Yes; we only surrender the pick if we sign him and the Steelers don't match. It'll be interesting to see what the Niners do. I can't imagine we'd get more value at 30 than Wallace.

It kind of seems like a no-brainer, which usually means I'm missing something.
 

Badger8843

Active Member
1,056
0
36
Joined
Aug 4, 2011
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Umm I would give up our 30th pick right now and not think twice. A guy who is 25 years old and has averaged 1,200 yards and 9 Tds in the past 2 seasons for a low ass draft pick
 

Badger8843

Active Member
1,056
0
36
Joined
Aug 4, 2011
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Pitt is working hard to keep Wallace,I wouldn't go getting my hopes up on him jumping to the 49ers

He wants to play for a contender, your starting back wont be the same and you lost Ward and will lose Wallace and a new OC, sounds like the Ravens have that division locked up
 

Crimsoncrew

Well-Known Member
10,323
56
48
Joined
Aug 4, 2011
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
He wants to play for a contender, your starting back wont be the same and you lost Ward and will lose Wallace and a new OC, sounds like the Ravens have that division locked up

None of which pertains to the defense. The Steelers are still a contender. They've got to make some upgrades, but they're still one of the better teams in the league when Ben is healthy.
 

Ray_Dogg

Troll Hunter
7,805
0
0
Joined
Dec 2, 2010
Location
Bay Area
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Steelers have now also cut Kemoeatu and Aaron Smith.
 

threelittleturds

anteater
6,726
1
0
Joined
Aug 4, 2011
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Pittsburgh has set it up so that if their negotiations don't work, they can just let someone else do the work for them and match the offer. Pretty much what the 49ers did with Andy Lee a few years back. If I remember correctly, it was the Steelers who negotiated our contract for Lee.

It wouldn't be worth the trouble to devote all that time to signing him, just to have the Steelers match it..
 

Ray_Dogg

Troll Hunter
7,805
0
0
Joined
Dec 2, 2010
Location
Bay Area
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
A team with cap space could front load the deal to an amount Pitt can't match. That is the trump card.
 

threelittleturds

anteater
6,726
1
0
Joined
Aug 4, 2011
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
A team with cap space could front load the deal to an amount Pitt can't match. That is the trump card.

Yeah, I was wondering about those poison pill things, and that sorta qualifies. But then I thought someone like Roethlisberger might just restructure his deal so that he gets paid peanuts this year and a lot next year to split the difference.
 

Ray_Dogg

Troll Hunter
7,805
0
0
Joined
Dec 2, 2010
Location
Bay Area
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Roth just recently restructured his contract. Pitt is in really bad shape. Another team should shoot Wallace a front loaded deal just to make their cap situation even worse.
 

threelittleturds

anteater
6,726
1
0
Joined
Aug 4, 2011
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Roth just recently restructured his contract. Pitt is in really bad shape. Another team should shoot Wallace a front loaded deal just to make their cap situation even worse.

Damn, thats fucking boss right there. That'd be smart as hell for a team inside the division to do that, front load it because they'd be afraid to lose him to a division rival... with the pure intention of putting the Steelers into cap hell.

Pretty devious...
 
Top