It actually could. That's exactly what it could do. You have this Kyrie opt-out planted deeply in your negative nellie psyche. He could very well decide to stay, and it seems like the organization has a good feeling that he wants to be in Boston for a long time.which is why you should be building for like 2021.
This move does nothing of the sort.
It actually could. That's exactly what it could do. You have this Kyrie opt-out planted deeply in your negative nellie psyche. He could very well decide to stay, and it seems like the organization has a good feeling that he wants to be in Boston for a long time.
Dude, how many all stars do you think are available with 4 or 5 years on a contract?Because you can't assusme that, so you can only value the trade based on how long he's under this contract. It's no different than assuming the Sox will resign Addison Reed because they could so that makes the trade better. No, it's whatever his contract says is left, that's what you're paying for.
second, the celtics traded for him like he's a top 10 player.
the reality is he isn't even a top 20 player is more like top 30ish. At best.
So... it appears IT was about on the same injury time line as he was all along...
... and Cleveland dangled him out there in public, trying to use fears over his injury as a post-deal bargaining tool...
... going days on end without clarifying their concerns...
... all to gain, what? An extra 2nd round pick? Maybe a late 1st?
Cleveland looks terrible here. What a classless organization.
Because you can't assusme that, so you can only value the trade based on how long he's under this contract. It's no different than assuming the Sox will resign Addison Reed because they could so that makes the trade better. No, it's whatever his contract says is left, that's what you're paying for.
second, the celtics traded for him like he's a top 10 player.
the reality is he isn't even a top 20 player is more like top 30ish. At best.
There is always a risk that a player may not re-sign. Having 2 years left on his contract gives the Celtics a far better chance to keep him than if it were only 1 year left. Gives them a season to see what they can do and then make whatever roster adjustments are necessary to improve. Assuming the Celtics are the best team in the East when he becomes an FA, it's unlikely that he turns that down. Especially considering that there likely won't be anywhere else that he can go that will give him a better chance to win.
He's not top 10, but he's definitely top 20 and closer to 10 than 20. I'd put him in the top 15. With his ability to score, if Stevens could get him to ba at least an average defender, he could get into the top 10.
The Celtics didn't overpay for him because he's not worth what they gave up. They overpaid because they likely didn't have to give up as much. However, to be fair, as someone else mentioned, IT's injury may be why the Celtics had to give up more.
Secondly, Celtics fans getting upset over the Cavs doing their due dilligence about a star player's injury is getting ridiculous.
This physical very well might have been the first serious look at the injury since May. A lot could have happened between now and then and the Cavs have every right to take every second they want to evaluate the injury and consider the ramifications.
He's closer to 30 than 15.
You couldn't be more wrong.
Sure I could.
I could take your position.
Kyrie is so bad on defense, it tanks his overall value despite being a good offensive player.
And yet, he's still better defensively than IT.
Let me guess, you actually think IT is the better player.
cmon man..someone who values integrity and class.
Not a douche bag saying #Free Brady....free him from what?
The truth?
Justice?
Actually being treated like any other player and not given a pass because he's a star?
you were also the one that said Kyrie wasnt even a top 6 point guard less than a year ago.You couldn't be more wrong.
Please don't tell me you think IT is better.
Maybe. You wanna argue about it?
you were also the one that said Kyrie wasnt even a top 6 point guard less than a year ago.
You yourself just got finished saying that all indications are that the trade is going through.First of all, we still don't know whether the trade is actually going through or not.
Again, all indications at this point are that this situation has less to do with "due diligence" and more to do with after-the-fact extortion.gt said:Secondly, Celtics fans getting upset over the Cavs doing their due dilligence about a star player's injury is getting ridiculous.
Yes, they had every right to give IT a physical. No doubt.gt said:This physical very well might have been the first serious look at the injury since May. A lot could have happened between now and then and the Cavs have every right to take every second they want to evaluate the injury and consider the ramifications.
Read the links I have offered today. As each day of this saga has dragged out, the excuses have basically worn out by this point.gt said:If that makes a couple of Celtics fans whine for a few days so be it.
Losing like how, the Lakers?