molsaniceman
I aint drunk Im just drinking
As a pats fan i approve of this thread I dont believe any of it but it sounds GREAT
Footballoutsiders has almost a 60% that the Super Bowl winner will be New England, Seattle or Dallas.
That said, Trump is the President-elect and Golden St won no hardware last year. All it takes is one bad hit to Gronk and NE is very vulnerable.
vCash bet? You take NE, i'll take the field?Just fast-forward to the superbowl because who's going to win in Foxbourough? There has not been a obvious AFC winner since 2007.
I disagree. I think they are saying that there is 1 super favorite, 2 really strong favorites and then everyone else.I think at this point, odds of 60% aren't much
You can't even get the current standings right, and we're supposed to take your word on what's going to happen in the future?Here is the AFC picture as of now
1.NE 7-2
2.KC 7-2
3.Bal 6-3
4.Hou 6-3
5.Oak 7-2
6.Den 7-3
I'm a little slow following you...are you saying just put NE in the SB?
If so, have you really been watching NE much? Granted, Brady is looking good, but they have a DEF that's just average really and that was before they got rid of their best DEF player.
NE is still going to be a tough out in this playoff and I won't be a homer fool and say PIT, but imo OAK, DEN, KC can all win a game in NE...a team that can rush the passer and man up on the slot, will give NE problems.
You're right, KC may have something to say about that.Who says the AFC playoffs are going through Foxborough?
Sadly NO.Is this thread being bumped from November 2015?
KC, or Oakland, or Denver. Still a lot of football to be played.You're right, KC may have something to say about that.
Jamie Collins was not their best defensive player
You are confusing "most athletic" with "most effective". He's a guy with freakish athletic skills and maddening inconsistency.
Probably not. But they are 0-1 without him...interestingJamie Collins was not their best defensive player