Otis B. Driftwood
New Member
I have to read more before I make my decision, but if the NHL drops out of the top 4 I will stop following it.
Made me laugh...
I have to read more before I make my decision, but if the NHL drops out of the top 4 I will stop following it.
Columbus had a shitty Arena situation, but were never really in danger of moving. It was a power struggle between the local government and a corporation that suddenly decided they didn't want to own an arena anymore and wanted the city to buy it right away and everyone used the team as the trump card. It was all slush accounting. It was about as likely as the Pens leaving Pittsburgh. Threatened, but never really viable.
Because all that has changed is ownership of the moving pieces and suddenly everyone that was going broke two years ago is fine. It was all BS.
But Melnyk blowing the Sens profits is a valid concern.
I believe what you've written, but the scuttlebutt for years on the BJ's was eerily similar in tone to what was going on down in Atlanta. I always advocated Lumbus could work, FWIW. Very rare that the NHL gets to be the only pro sports franchise in an American city.
I have to read more before I make my decision, but if the NHL drops out of the top 4 I will stop following it.
That's where I stopped reading. Of course in the eyes of ESPN and its viewers/listeners, NHL is no longer a major sport because E$PN doesn't cover it nor make much money from it. They will talk down the sport any chance they get unless at some point they have a TV contract with the league, then all of a sudden, it will be "pertinent" again.
I actually think that Nashville has a nice niche following...but like any team in these markets (which really means any non-Canadian market): you have to win to maintain financial success.
In regard to the OP: if the NHL had a better TV deal (not necessarily with E**N), the conversation would probably be different. Personally, every time these conversations come up it reminds me how insecure sports fans can be. The NHL is gaining speed, the NBA is not. If Lebron James didn't exist, they'd be in major trouble. If Sidney Crosby didn't exist, I'm pretty sure the NHL would be just fine. But it just reeks of fans who don't understand the sport trying to justify it. "This is confusing, therefore it is stupid and no one in their right mind should like it."
You Know What's Stupid? Everything I Don't Understand | The Onion - America's Finest News Source
I'm always interested to hear how it was all portrayed elsewhere. They did have some issues running it at first with a terrible GM and having it be a division of a larger corporation, but the bottom line was Nationwide built the Arena so they made all the parking and concession money. The team saw nothing of naming rights money. The city only got sales tax and income tax on the employees of the city (the US Citizens anyways), and all three were "damn near broke".
So the city bought the Arena from Nationwide for (essentially) tax breaks.
City gets Concession Revenue and an attraction downtown they control.
Nationwide gets cheap land surrounding the arena that they have filled with condos and restaurants
Team gets a cheap 35 year lease and some of that sweet, sweet naming rights cash.
The crazy thing is, they have another 18k seat Arena right near OSU that the city owns that they were supposed to play in. So they might have moved. Across town.
I cannot fathom that soccer has more average fans in seats compared to NHL ??? Are the tickets $5 a piece or something ?
I cannot fathom that soccer has more average fans in seats compared to NHL ??? Are the tickets $5 a piece or something ?
Not to worry. I don't think the NHL has used it's immunity idol yet / victory in the bank yet.
That will surely restore them to mythical top 4 status.
I like this comment for a couple of reasons.Most of the people I talk sports with in my neck of the woods don't give the slightest crap about the NBA and would love to trade the Milwaukee Bucks for one of the floundering NHL franchises south of the Mason-Dixon line. Meanwhile, I'd expect the majority of those polled who rate NASCAR over hockey live south of the Mason-Dixon.
Also, I don't particularly agree with the concept of the NHL needing an individual face of the league. One thing that greatly attracts me to hockey is that it is the ultimate selfless team sport where players sacrifice themselves at all costs for the benefit of the team and the players that don't get exiled. It puts me off when a player's individualism and ego infiltrates and dissipates team unity. I say keep hockey about the team.
I like this too. It's not that I'm rooting for hockey to "NOT" become the most popular sport, it's just that I'm sick and tired of Buttman and the idiot GM's continuous efforts to change the game or specific rules to appeal to people who don't understand the sport anyway.I dont want it to be "major"
I like the "cult" like following
I like this too. It's not that I'm rooting for hockey to "NOT" become the most popular sport, it's just that I'm sick and tired of Buttman and the idiot GM's continuous efforts to change the game or specific rules to appeal to people who don't understand the sport anyway.