Gman
Well-Known Member
This repsonse goes out to @Mecca as well.
That said, so what?
The fact that IT wanted back in tells us the C's didn't screw him. IT wasn't lied to or led on... and there is no evidence that the C's medical staff misled him either.
To me, cold blooded has a distinct negative connotation. It implies the party that was cold blooded did something wrong.
So you're saying in the same breath that the C's were both right and wrong... which is mush.
If the C's didn't lie to him or lead him on or anything like that... (and there is no evidence that they did)... this was pure business, not anything else. Remember that Isaiah was hinting at a desire for a huge payday as well... ("gonna have to back up the Brinks truck!")... leave injury issues aside, it was very debatable that any team should pay a 5'9" hopeless defensive liability like IT superstar money.
If any player doesn't like it... they can go to a poorly run team and deal with all the negatives that that entails. Good luck on the Knicks if you don't like the reality of the business.![Wink ;) ;)](/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
Yeah... IT's human... I don't begrudge him being emotional at the time... I had very mixed feelings about it as a fan... I'm sure the C's weren't happy he was leaving... it wasn't personal.IT may not hold a grudge today. But he was devastated when this deal went down. That was clear.
That said, so what?
The fact that IT wanted back in tells us the C's didn't screw him. IT wasn't lied to or led on... and there is no evidence that the C's medical staff misled him either.
I think you're trying to have it both ways here... unless you mean something by "cold blooded" that is substantially different than how I would use that phrase.tlance said:And the damage IT did to his body playing through those injuries for the Celtics may well have ruined his career. I am not even saying that Ainge did the wrong thing in dealing him. It is pretty clear that from a basketball perspective it was the correct move. But it was cold blooded.
To me, cold blooded has a distinct negative connotation. It implies the party that was cold blooded did something wrong.
So you're saying in the same breath that the C's were both right and wrong... which is mush.
If the C's didn't lie to him or lead him on or anything like that... (and there is no evidence that they did)... this was pure business, not anything else. Remember that Isaiah was hinting at a desire for a huge payday as well... ("gonna have to back up the Brinks truck!")... leave injury issues aside, it was very debatable that any team should pay a 5'9" hopeless defensive liability like IT superstar money.
Meh. Any well run team should move you if it serves the team's future. That's the business.tlance said:Also, for as long as I can remember, core Celtic players ALWAYS seem to be involved in trade rumors. It is the reason Ray Allen opted to go to Miami. While I don't think the Celtics would ever flip AD, the harsh reality is that signing a long term deal in Boston means that you KNOW Ainge will move you if it serves the team's future.
Better get that NTC.
If any player doesn't like it... they can go to a poorly run team and deal with all the negatives that that entails. Good luck on the Knicks if you don't like the reality of the business.
![Wink ;) ;)](/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)