• Have something to say? Register Now! and be posting in minutes!

If you had One Game To Save Your Life...

Mistaken4193

REGISTERED GUMP!!!
22,823
8,277
533
Joined
Apr 17, 2013
Location
ALABAMA
Hoopla Cash
$ 142.55
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I have a new one. Madison Bumgarner
 

4down20

Quit checking me out.
56,133
8,402
533
Joined
May 10, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 394.91
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Nolan Ryan
 

4down20

Quit checking me out.
56,133
8,402
533
Joined
May 10, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 394.91
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
That would kinda be like playing Russian Roulette with bullets in three out of six chambers.
:noidea:

I quit watching baseball on a regular basis when they went on strike in the early 90's and he was the best pitcher I ever saw.

Seems like a solid choice to me.
 

steveringo

People's Front of Judea
25,269
17,190
1,033
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Location
Winchestertonfieldville
Hoopla Cash
$ 200.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
It becomes a very interesting comparison when you look at it closer....

Pedro over his career of 2827 innings had a 154 ERA+, 1.05 WHIP and 4.15 K/BB.

Johnson by comparison had 1300 more innings than Pedro, but if you break it down, he had a 2775 inning stretch (close to Pedro's career total) from 1993-2005 where he had a 160 ERA+, 1.08 WHIP and 4.28 K/BB.

So basically, Johnson had a Pedro-like 'career' within his career, with an additional 1300 innings of being mediocre for the most part.


Yep, I noticed that... And I noticed he had some relatively mediocre years before Alex Rodriguez joined the team.... And, he got better after the age of 35 much like Roger Clemens.... And, he played well into his 40's just like Barry Bonds...


giphy.gif
 

steveringo

People's Front of Judea
25,269
17,190
1,033
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Location
Winchestertonfieldville
Hoopla Cash
$ 200.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
:noidea:

I quit watching baseball on a regular basis when they went on strike in the early 90's and he was the best pitcher I ever saw.

Seems like a solid choice to me.

He pitched for a long time - and back then, the news only reported the highlights, so most people only saw the good stuff. He had many more average years than good years (and quite a few below average years). Referencing a half-loaded game of russian roulette is actually a nice analogy.... His strike out totals, longevity, and no-hitters are the main reasons he is overrated. (And, that is not saying he was not good. Most reasononable people would still have him in the top 25 or 30 of all time).
 
Top