StanMarsh51
Well-Known Member
Interesting to note that RJ got better as he got deeper into the postseason:
LDS - 4.85 ERA
LCS - 1.72 ERA
WS - 1.04 ERA
LDS - 4.85 ERA
LCS - 1.72 ERA
WS - 1.04 ERA
The only reasonable answer to this is Sandy Koufax, the original Kershaw.
This
Roy Halladay in his heyday is pretty close too.
I wish he pitched longer. He took a few years to warm up, but was absolutely dominant for 5 years.... Then arthritis (?!) forces him to retire at 30???
I remember Pedro being very proud, when people were comparing his crazy seven year stretch to Koufax. Many pitchers have random insane seasons, but very few string more than a few together like Koufax & Martinez.
From 1997 to 2003, Pedro's adjusted ERA was 213! From 1961 to 1966, Koufax put up an ERA+ of 156...
Comparatively, Kershaw's last four seasons was 172! Maddux from 1992-1998 was 192! Clemens from 1986-1994 was 153. Randy Johnson from 2000-2005 was 159.
.
Surprised nobody has said Curt Schilling.
I would start before 2000 for Johnson's "prime." From 1999-2004, RJ had a 175 ERA+, and if we go back even further, from 1994-2004 his ERA+ was at 170 (a 2300 inning span).
Who are you putting on the Mound?????
For Myself I would put Randy Johnson out there. He had the nastiest Slider known to man and I saw him pitch a perfect game in person and he was incredible. Plus he was clutch in the Postseason.
The guy on the bump tonight for the G-men. Flat out as nasty as they come.
To me era plays part in it. Johnson was dominate and reminds me of the one guy who would still dominate any era of baseball.
Most here never saw the Drysdale's and Koufax's of the world so...
The guy on the bump tonight for the G-men. Flat out as nasty as they come.
So if your life depended on it and you had to choose one pitcher, you'd choose Madison Bumgarner?
So if your life depended on it and you had to choose one pitcher, you'd choose Madison Bumgarner?