Southieinnc
Do Your Job!
no problem with that.Have zero point zero reason to think he suddenly wont be able to in the NFL.
no problem with that.Have zero point zero reason to think he suddenly wont be able to in the NFL.
I would love to have him on the Cowboys as a #4 WR
Sounds a bit like Percy Harvin.
Better wingspan : body ratio than Calvin Johnson
As quick of cuts as Stephon Diggs
Quicker reaction time to ball than DeAndre Hopkins
Sounds a bit like Percy Harvin.
Unfortunately athleticism and related potential does not necessarily equal success in the NFL. History is littered with uber athletes who failed at that level.
For NFL wide receivers, athleticism doesn't necessarily lead to value
NFL wide receivers are often valued for their athletic traits. However, athleticism alone does not lead to a receiver being more valuable to their team.www.profootballnetwork.com
Has some similar attributes.completely different player than percy harvin.
Has some similar attributes.
The point being that athleticism and potential are most certainly not a guarantee of success at the NFL level.
Did you read the article?
So your answer is no.Not sure how that article is relevant.
So your answer is no.
You can't speak to relevancy when you didn't even bother to check it out.
The article also specifically shows how potential and athleticism do not guarantee success on the NFL level.From your article:
What types of wide receivers should the NFL be looking for?
The point of these statistics is not that NFL teams shouldn’t try to draft athletic wide receivers. Athleticism often separates a good receiver from a great one. An extraordinary wide receiver combines their athleticism with skill and technique. Skill and consistency are just as crucial to a receiver’s impact on their offense as their athleticism, if not significantly more so. NFL teams and fans need to do a better job of recognizing that fact and focusing on the traits that actually matter when it comes to how effective a wide receiver is, rather than on how athletic they are.
So sounds like DeVonta Smith fits that bill. Extremely skilled and consistent WR.
The article also specifically shows how potential and athleticism do not guarantee success on the NFL level.
When all is said and done it is highly likely that relatively slow and small Cooper Kupp will have had a much more successful career than DeVonta Smith.
The really bizarre part is you promoting Smith as "the best WR in the league in 3 years" before he even plays a single game. For all of his perceived potential he also has big question marks in several areas. Maybe he can pull it off, but skepticism is warranted at this point.But DeVonta Smith is smaller than Kupp.
You're entire argument is bizarre. You're acting like DeVonta Smith was drafted high because he was a workout warrior that killed it at the combine. But he hardly took part in the combine, didn't run a 40 time. Was knocked in the pre-draft process as being too small/skinny, not having elite speed in comparison to Waddle. If anything your article supports the idea that Smith will be more likely to be better at the pro level than Chase and Waddle because he doesn't just possess a physical potential but has shown to be a highly skilled and consistent technician at the position.
The really bizarre part is you promoting Smith as "the best WR in the league in 3 years" before he even plays a single game. For all of his perceived potential he also has big question marks in several areas. Maybe he can pull it off, but skepticism is warranted at this point.
More power to him if he can become great, but your current predictions of his greatness are a pretty large over-reach at this time.