HuskerCradle2Grave
Big Red in the Big Ten!
On the flip side Larry Brown has stated that MJ would average 50 with these patty cake rules today. Brown has stated that the college game is tougher today, physically speaking...
On the flip side Larry Brown has stated that MJ would average 50 with these patty cake rules today. Brown has stated that the college game is tougher today, physically speaking...
Physical play does not equal good defense. It just means you get more bruises.
And I doubt MJ would get 50 per game. The same zone rules that stop Lebron and Kobe from just driving it down all the time would be there for MJ. And considering that MJ wasn't a great 3 point shooter, he'd have a hard time finding those extra points. He'd still likely fall somewhere in the 30s. His assist totals would skyrocket though because he'd draw a hell of a lot of help defense.
You are right. You know more than hall of fame coach Larry Brown. My bad...
He reached his max when he said the 2015 Cavs would "destroy" the 1992 'Bad Boy' Pistons
If you look at Lebron's skillset and have him play under the pre 2000 rule changes like in the 80s/90s with handchecking and all that stuff, honestly, he'd probably be even better. He's so big handchecking would barely bother him. Good luck keeping him out of the paint since you can't use any of the modern NBA defense that allows for zone principles. You're only choice is to defend him one on one (good luck) or hard double him once he's posted up but he's such a gifted passer, he'll make you pay for sure on that hard double. You could hard foul him but he'd likely adjust and get tougher. You remember how prime Barkley could go coast to coast and just bully fools? Now imagine that with Magic Johnson's passing skills. That's Lebron under those rules. My guess is his assists numbers would drop some because he'd be harder to cover and thus wouldn't need to pass as often. His scoring average would go up, probably somewhere between 33 to 35pts per game.
Or Brown just made a flippant comment in a radio interview without really thinking about it. 50 a game is really freaking hard under any set of rules
Or Brown just made a flippant comment in a radio interview without really thinking about it. 50 a game is really freaking hard under any set of rules
He reached his max when he said the 2015 Cavs would "destroy" the 1992 'Bad Boy' Pistons
where would he have ended up?
I'm putting him solidly in between Xavier McDaniel and Dominique.
Slightly better than X-man but not nearly as good as 'Nique.
Opinions?
PS - Yes, I think he could have eclipsed Thurl Bailey.
The only reason I see that we dont is that basketball is also a game of fundamentals ie shooting, ball handling and intelligence. I think we could mostly agree that guys in the 80's were overall much better shooters and fundamentally sounder than guys that play now. It would be an interesting dynamic to see a guy like Dwight Howard go up against Kareem, or a guy like Derrick Rose go up against Dennis Johnson etc etc. Would the clearly superior athleticism from todays generation be too much for those guys or would the overall better basketball acumen be too much for the athletes of todays age??
Comparing Lebron to Jordan is ridiculous. They play entirely different games. The player his game most resembles is Magic. The problem for Lebron is he will likely never be anywhere near as good a player as Magic was. Magic even played Center in the Finals against Philly. He dominated that game & so many others. I still remember the sky hook he made to beat the Celtics & basically win the title for the Lakers. Magic was CLUTCH.
Basketball is unique in that it is really the only sport ( save MAYBE baseball ) where we think guys that played 30/340/50 years ago could compete with guys that play now. In the NFL for example we look back at the size and speed difference we see and naturally assume the guys that played decades ago would get crushed by the guys that play now. In basketball we really dont do that. While the sports are different I think we dont credit todays guys enough with the vastly superior athleticism and physical training they have as compared to older generation guys. The only reason I see that we dont is that basketball is also a game of fundamentals ie shooting, ball handling and intelligence. I think we could mostly agree that guys in the 80's were overall much better shooters and fundamentally sounder than guys that play now. It would be an interesting dynamic to see a guy like Dwight Howard go up against Kareem, or a guy like Derrick Rose go up against Dennis Johnson etc etc. Would the clearly superior athleticism from todays generation be too much for those guys or would the overall better basketball acumen be too much for the athletes of todays age??
"Anywhere near as..."? I have a revelation for you, friend: He already is "near" Magic, dont be ridiculous