CreepCreep2014
Well-Known Member
Please tell us you have never served on, nor ever will serve on, a jury case.
No and no....
Please tell us you have never served on, nor ever will serve on, a jury case.
No and no....
the vikings used sideline heaters to illegally alter the football last season.
Pay attention.
Here's what Rodgers did against the Seahawks defense when he lost to them two weeks before Brady beat them...
19/34, 55.9%, 178 yards, 1 TD, 2 interceptions, 55.8 rating, and 5.24 ypa
Compare that to Brady's 4th quarter...
13/15, 86.7%, 124 yards, 2 TDs, 140.7 rating and 8.3 ypa
Clearly one guy shredded them when the season was on the line and one guy didn't.
Rodgers is good too though. Could even end the year better than Brady. But he wasn't better at the end of the 2014 season.
You and the several Pats fans liking this post can't honestly believe this is a valid comparison. Rodgers was playing in Seattle against a Seahawks defense that was healthy for the majority of the game. Brady was playing in a neutral site against a defense that had:
Earl Thomas playing with a torn labrum
Kam Chancellor playing with a torn MCL
Richard Sherman playing with a torn ligament in his elbow
Jeremy Lane out for most of the game with a broken arm
Cliff Avril out for half of the game with a concussion
Tharold Simon playing with a shoulder injury
Brady "shredded" that defense by targeting whoever was line up on Simon over and over again. I would assume if Rodgers had a third string injured corner to target for three quarters of a game his numbers would probably look better.
Also gotta laugh at saying "Brady beat Seattle" or "Rodgers lost to Seattle". It's a team game. What it really came down to was the Patriots had a guy make an amazing play on defense to save the game while the Packers didn't.
excuses, excuses, excuses.....Brady took what was given to him. I believe your All Pro CB Sherman states "if it's not broke, don't fix it". Was that it? So why would NE need to change it's game plan, just to amuse some posters on here, lol....
And BTW I'm not trying to take anything away from New England in the Super Bowl. Yes Seattle had some injuries but they obviously did not adjust as well as they possibly could have and had a chance to win it at the end. A bonehead play call and a great read by Malcolm Butler just got in the way. The Pats won that game fair and square (as far as we know ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) ).
I thought that I had read that a while back. I Googled it again and couldn't find anything regarding them getting fined so, I guess it didn't happen after all.
I also read the article referring to them heating balls on the sideline and it contradicts itself so, I'm not sure if they did or, didn't heat game balls on the sidelines.
Both teams had injuries, it's part of the game. Still one of the best SB I have seen played. I was stating that people say Brady sucked because he was not tossing the football 50yds down field and passed for 600yrds and 5td's. All good offenses take what is given to them and then take some shots to keep the defense honest, that is what NE did. There is no way you can compare GB offense to NE, I think they are totally different. One being that Rodgers can throw the deep ball. IMO Brady cannot throw it anymore. Brady's decision making and quickness to make those decisions might be the same, but his skills are not, NE adapts for that. Not saying you were saying that, just making a point. Like what Sherman said, not broke, don't fix...and he is right. Make the Def adjust to you, not the other way around. Either way.....I am not an NBA fan either....was that the point..LOL
no, they were heating up the balls...them and the panthers. there is video.Try again:
By rule, the home team is responsible for providing the game balls. The footage shown on NFL Network is from the Vikings' sideline, though there are attendants from both teams on both sidelines and a league source said the Vikings weren't heating up the balls during the game.
Zimmer said he hadn't heard anything from the league about it on Monday, adding, "Somebody told me (Carolina's) ball boys were doing it."
Reds, it has been NW and Rock who started most of these Pats are innocent threads and have highjacked just as many other topics with the same jargon....
I don't really care because I like the banter, but the truth is the truth and these guys are over the top with it...
I'm just waiting to see how it all shakes out and how many go into hiding afterward....
It's gonna be special,
He was atrocious. They won in spite of him. 3-yard dumps to the slot or INTs. It was one or the other. The Seahawks literally tossed them the Super Bowl because Brady was abysmal.
HAHAHHA Okay, if cherry picking helps you have peace of mind, so be it.
You and the several Pats fans liking this post can't honestly believe this is a valid comparison. Rodgers was playing in Seattle against a Seahawks defense that was healthy for the majority of the game. Brady was playing in a neutral site against a defense that had:
Earl Thomas playing with a torn labrum
Kam Chancellor playing with a torn MCL
Richard Sherman playing with a torn ligament in his elbow
Jeremy Lane out for most of the game with a broken arm
Cliff Avril out for half of the game with a concussion
Tharold Simon playing with a shoulder injury
Brady "shredded" that defense by targeting whoever was line up on Simon over and over again. I would assume if Rodgers had a third string injured corner to target for three quarters of a game his numbers would probably look better.
Also gotta laugh at saying "Brady beat Seattle" or "Rodgers lost to Seattle". It's a team game. What it really came down to was the Patriots had a guy make an amazing play on defense to save the game while the Packers didn't.
It ain't all of us Cave.
....and did those stats compare Brady's 4th quarter to Rodger's entire game. Kind of erases a few of Tom's mistakes, no?