handicappers
FAT STACKS BITCHES
Lol
Manster was comparing Dak and Wentz. He brought up their stats from one game and I said you can’t use stats from one game in their careers and say Dak is better.
It’s like if Nick Sudfeld has a great game and I say Nick Sudfeld has 5
TDs today and Dak only had one today. So Sudfeld is a better QB. You then come post just because Sudfeld had one better game this week it doesn’t mean Sudfeld is better then Dak. Get it?
"One game in there career means he’s better. Fucking hilarious dude. One game? Okie dokie"
it wouldnt count.I wonder if I should inform the Moron that Dak has a number of games better than Wentz in their careers.
I wonder if I should inform the Moron that Dak has a number of games better than Wentz in their careers.
yeah I think it was in the 98's last night if I remember correct.I’m still waiting for him to respond to me pointing out that Wentz had more than one game this year where his QBR was below 100. He stated that only happened one time this year. I pointed out it had happened 3 times before last night and I think he was slightly below 100 last night too.
Let’s see him walk that one back as well.
yeah I think it was in the 98's last night if I remember correct.
I guess that is another way of saying Ignorance is Bliss.I’ll say this about @PhoenixEagles1 : often in error... never in doubt.
He doesn’t call the plays so he isn’t padding his stats but you are spot on it’s moronic they didn’t run more this uear
Ok I’m finally answering your last point. I’ve continually said Center never get drafted high. Not one in the top 14 in 50 years. Then you come back with DEs get drafted more then QBs so you are saying that DE is more important then QB. This is where you are completely wrong and put an idea out there that I never said or implied. Never once did I say the more a position gets drafted early the more important they are. I don’t know where you even came up with that idea.
You cant use the draft to support one argument, but not another, when they are both facts.......you realize this right? this is the basis of my point. your draft argument is invalid. You fail to acknowledge that. Yes your stats are correct, but so are mine. THey both are flawed.
This year DTs are going to dominate the top picks and they are not more important then DE... it’s just a great year for DTs. So this entire idea by you that because a position gets drafted MORE means they are more important.
Never once did I say that or insinuate that. All I ever said is Center never goes really high because they simply aren’t as important.
Again you cant use the draft to support one argument but not another. Its flawed. You need a new argument.
I have a better word to illustrate my point and that’s impact. Centers do not have a big impact on a team like the other positions. They just aren’t huge game changers. If they were huge game changers at least one team in the last 50 years would take them in the top 14.
Every single position including has gone in the top 14 except Centers, Punters and Kickers and I just can’t fathom how people are saying, “Oh, that means nothing”. If there was a team out there that believed “Man if we had a really good Center we’d be competitive yet not one team in over 50 years, over 700 picks said let’s use a top pick on a Center cause a great one would make us awesome.
Never once did I say the amount of player positions that go in the top 14 are the most important. All I said was if a Center was so important a team would say “Let’s get a Center early because then we will be a good team. 700 draft picks and not once was that said by any of the 32 teams.
Again the draft argument........thats literally all you have and its flawed!
Look its quite simple. THe draft supports your argument. SO you use it. But when the draft supports my argument, its flawed? THe point is there are other variables that come into play with the draft. you are not acknowledging that. You cannot use it to support one argument and it ignore it on another.
You have state before the draft is all that matters, its all you need to support your point. My little example shows the flaw in the belief.
and again, you cant fault PFF rankings on the basis you disagree with brandon grahams rating.1 player, 1 metric of the thousands and thousands that they do. you claim that the "pros" do the draft and thats what matters. Well the "pros" use PFF metrics. yet now they are invalid. and even using football outsiders metrics, which are also respected. You discount those. with philly having at worst a top 15 o-line overall, and ONLY a recent slip in pass protection due to tackle injury. which means prior he had a pretty god damn good pass protection.....and still is in th top 2/3 of the leage.
i dont know how you can just keep picking and choosing arguments and validity.
I wonder if I should inform the Moron that Dak has a number of games better than Wentz in their careers.
No shit dumbass. I was the one telling you he’s had tons of games better then Wentz. But since you can’t be a man an say “My bad” ever, this is all pointless.
Yeah I do bc u come back to the draft? Again u can’t have it both ways . It works for u but not me? That’s bsYour example didn’t show anything because it’s a completely different point that I never brought up. Plus I gave you a lot more then one example. Do you need me to go over it again?
Yeah I do bc u come back to the draft? Again u can’t have it both ways . It works for u but not me? That’s bs