PhoenixEagles1
Well-Known Member
Damn you are so dense.
Everytime you want to make a point for yourself you use the best player at QB, WR , or whatever.
Furthermore. The best WR vs. good WR is a huge difference. (same with QB & other diva positions)
The very best Center vs. a good center isnt as big of a difference.
When talking importance of positions you are not talking players.
Here are some facts.
Teams have been successful with a good QB (pretty hard though I admit)
Teams have done it without RB, without WRs etc...
You want success you win the trenches.
Without a good center you dont have a good O-line "unit" Just the way it is.
With higher end QBs. how do you get to them, to get them off their game? Up the middle!!! If that is happening, you will kinda wish you had a good center.
If your Qb is getting less than 2 sec. to throw does it really matter how good their #1 receiver is? if your center isnt understanding the game. It will affect your running game as well.
Sounds like pretty important position to me.
As I remind you. you were saying it was one of the least important positions in football. Now if their other posters that agree with you on this. I dont want to single just you out. They are fucking stupid as well!
It might be one of the most thankless jobs, which all the stat warriors cant see on paper, but I assure you it is a "very" important position.
Here’s my favorite argument of them all. Some fat, unathletic kid tries out for the football team. You know damn well we’re they are putting this pimple faced oaf.
Every position is very important. Imagine losing game after game cause your kicker missed every FG or your long snapper chucks the ball over the punters head time after time. It would be very important to fix that position. You fixing that with a top 5 pick... nope. Wanna know why? Cause QB, LT, DE, CB, WR1 is much more important then C