Taddy Mason
Well-Known Member
Yes we are spoon-fed too much nowadays, but a simple 2-3 minute scene that incorporated both the background & the timeline would have been easy to do and wouldn't have been overwhelming at all. A better closeup of those newspapers would have probably revealed a lot that. Given the amount of newspapers he had pinned up makes me think the invasion was some time in the past. All I'm really sayin is that it takes quite the leaps of faith to connect all these dots, and really nobody can say for certain whats true or not. Its all theories. Which is why so many people are drilling the ratings. I'm sure the ratings will hold because like you & I, people should be able to use their imagination to make up their own connections.
Well if the mother was indeed pregnant in the beginning sequence then I don't know why the director made the point after the timejump to get a close-up of her belly. They wanted it to be very clear that she was pregnant AFTER the timejump.
And another thing that I might have missed... Where the F did they get all that beach sand to make all those trails? That would have taken months or longer to complete.
I guess i just like to play devil's advocate regardless of the side, though i this seems like one of the times where I'm more in favor of a movie than others.
okay, so time-jump wise, i think it's clear she was pregnant at the beginning of the movie, i don't think that's arguable. if you want to guess as to how long the invasion has been before the opening scene and if they got pregnant afterwards, that's as far as I can give you on that.
okay, so time-jump wise, i think it's clear she was pregnant at the beginning of the movie, i don't think that's arguable. if you want to guess as to how long the invasion has been before the opening scene and if they got pregnant afterwards, that's as far as I can give you on that.
I did watch Hungry Wives yesterday, 1972 Romero flick, did not care for it.