- Thread starter
- #41
Jimmy completed 76% of passes to bums and 3rd stringers.
The Saints defensive starters are horrible... The third stringers .
Yea, it has nothing to do with it.The Packers use the west coast offense just like many other teams do. To say the system is responsible is just complete horseshit but then you are full of it.
right, point is he dropped for a reason, just like barkley, just like landry jones
If it were this easy, teams wouldnt be blowing #1 picks or $20M a year on QBs.The Packers system is the gold. Matt Flynn looked like Aaron Rodgers in that offense. Now he can't even find a job.
Hundley does have something that Barkley, Jones, Lienart, and others lack. He can make all the necessary throws to be a pro quarterback.
The guy had the highest QB rating of all QB's in the preseason but you seem to think it's just because of the system. You aren't the sharpest tool in the shed but you probably already realize that.Yea, it has nothing to do with it.
You just said the packers struck gold again with Hundley after 4 preseason games. You are less than smart.
I never said it was easy. My point was that McCarty's offensive scheme is probably the best in the league. A very QB friendly system that accurate QB's can flourish in.If it were this easy, teams wouldnt be blowing #1 picks or $20M a year on QBs.
So in your mind easier to find the talent than it is to replicate the system?I never said it was easy. My point was that McCarty's offensive scheme is probably the best in the league. A very QB friendly system that accurate QB's can flourish in.
The guy had the highest QB rating of all QB's in the preseason but you seem to think it's just because of the system. You aren't the sharpest tool in the shed but you probably already realize that.
There are no absolutes in football. But in some cases yes. Obviously you have to have talent and I would say most of the players drafted in the first 4 rounds have NFL talent. When you combine that with a great system and great coaching/play calling, you will get great results.So in your mind easier to find the talent than it is to replicate the system?
It seems you are dismissing the talent for the system in the case of GB. I think it's much easier to duplicate GB's offensive system (which is not unique in the NFL) than it would be to find another guy as good as Aaron Rodgers.I'm not quite sure what you are trying to get me to say. I think McCarthy system is gold. Do you disagree with that?
All I said was McCarthys system is gold. Do you disagree with that? I never said it was the only reason for Hundley's good play.
You said the Packers struck gold with Hundley based on 4 preseason games against inferior competition.
Should we have a poll asking who's statement is more asinine?
I agree it would be easier to duplicate the system as opposed to finding someone as good as Aaron Rodgers considering he is arguably the best player in the NFL.It seems you are dismissing the talent for the system in the case of GB. I think it's much easier to duplicate GB's offensive system (which is not unique in the NFL) than it would be to find another guy as good as Aaron Rodgers.
I am not asking you to speak in absolutes. Just asking for an opinion.
This is a stupid post.His system wasn't gold until he got to GB. Maybe, just maybe Favre and Rodgers makes his system gold.