AfrikaBlack
Active Member
On a good note those Texas uniforms were looking good
Sugar Bowl vs Alabama, year before last?
More recently than the faggot lizards.Big game Bob Stoops. How long since Oklahoma has won a big game? What a joke.
They had a frosh and a sophomore starting on the oline. You really think there is that big of a difference than two true freshmen, both who were top recruits in the country? Put that aside, do you think this team would have fared any better vs. Akron after that shit show we saw last night? We'll see this Saturday I guess..
I do. Redshirt Soph has 2 more years of working out aND training. It's a huge difference. Malik Jefferson added 20 LBs sine enrolling early. True freshmen rarely start Ina healthy program. It's even more rare when one is 17 and didn't enroll early
Not sure what the pt is here
Not sure what the pt is here
This is absolutely true. At 17, the kid is still growing, let alone experienced in the game at the college speed. No one can win a championship with such a huge lack of experience on the offensive line. Not only does the kid create a weak spot in the line, the other linemen have to help out which makes them less effective as well.True freshmen rarely start Ina healthy program. It's even more rare when one is 17 and didn't enroll early
You seemed to have forgotten aTm. Between the 3 last year 20 "blue chips".But here's what you're missing - despite those teams being currently top 10, neither of them has been recruiting the big-time blue chip guys. Go back and look at their recruiting rankings. That isn't an excuse.
I'm not saying fire him. In fact, I'm saying he's still going to be the coach in 2016 assuming they don't entirely bottom out this year.You seemed to have forgotten aTm. Between the 3 last year 20 "blue chips".
You claim excuse. I claim reason. More schools including OSU go for kids in Texas. All SEC, ACC, B12, and so on. Texas was not winning the last couple years of Mack. Kids want to go to a school that is winning, competes for ships, and can get them to the NFL. The Longhorns had no picks in the 2014 draft.
People are looking at 13 damn games for a team that lost talent due to a purge and a coach that did not have his class his first NSD. If next season they are 7-5 then start the yapping. Until then I would leave it be and see what he does instead of indicting him after 13 games!
I'm not saying fire him. In fact, I'm saying he's still going to be the coach in 2016 assuming they don't entirely bottom out this year.
However, I'm trying to point out that he's overrated as a coach and is doing a very poor job. Between 2012-2014, Texas brought in 38 recruits rated 4* or higher. I know he had a purge, but still! How can you take a team with that much talent and go 6-8 through 14 games with 6 - SIX! - losses by 20+ points? Almost half of his games, with that much talent, have resulted in a 20+ point loss with 3 of those coming at home. That's not something you see the elite, or even the great, coaches in the nation do.
Why make room for Will Fuller when you can list 85 Buckeyes, a couple SEC defensive players, and Trevone Boykin? That would require actual research by ESPNisTexas had ONE good play on offense all night.
Zaire looks awesome. And like I said in the off season it was a joke Will Fuller wasn't on ESPN's top 100 players in the country. 140 yards receiving w/ two TD's. Dude is a beast.
Or more to the point, why would ESPN go out of their way to market an NBC product?Why make room for Will Fuller when you can list 85 Buckeyes, a couple SEC defensive players, and Trevone Boykin? That would require actual research by ESPNis
Go look at the OL recruiting and what remains..
There's nothing outdated about what I said at all. It's entirely factual. I'm as knowledgeable as anyone who can look at a recruiting ranking site.Go look at the OL recruiting and what remains.. You are using outdated information and pretending to be knowledgeable on the topic. I hate when people blindly using recruiting rankings and ignore things like distribution of scholarships.