lasgop8
Lets do this!
Can you guys tell me what you see from him offensively that makes you think this?
Can you guys tell me what you see from him offensively that makes you think this?
you can see some of his offensive creativity and skill in spurts.. but the kid is 20 years old, not every 20 year old comes in and dominates right away.. but in flyer-land they pretty much have to or they get traded.
i'd be willing to bet a very large amount of money, that if the flyers traded couturier, even if it was for a 'stud' dman, philly would be outraged less than 2 years later because the stud dman would be overpaid and couturier would be lighting it up at a very palatable contract.
the flyers will never win a stanley cup if they continue to give up their picks and prospects for overpaid middle-aged veterans when they could have had similar production from young guys on ELC's or 2nd contracts. it is not a shock, or a coincidence, that the best contract on the flyers roster, BY FAR, is claude giroux, a flyers draft pick.
you can see some of his offensive creativity and skill in spurts.. but the kid is 20 years old, not every 20 year old comes in and dominates right away.. but in flyer-land they pretty much have to or they get traded.
i'd be willing to bet a very large amount of money, that if the flyers traded couturier, even if it was for a 'stud' dman, philly would be outraged less than 2 years later because the stud dman would be overpaid and couturier would be lighting it up at a very palatable contract.
the flyers will never win a stanley cup if they continue to give up their picks and prospects for overpaid middle-aged veterans when they could have had similar production from young guys on ELC's or 2nd contracts. it is not a shock, or a coincidence, that the best contract on the flyers roster, BY FAR, is claude giroux, a flyers draft pick.
plus, if you trade couturier for a dman.. for a legit dman it will take more than that, maybe couturier+read and a pick or two, or couturier, ghost, and a first.. how are you replacing couturier? assuming briere is bought out, you're going to roll in to next season with giroux, schenn, laughton, and talbot as your C's? that's a recipe for disaster. if laughton exceeds every single expectation put on him, he'll be similar to what couturier was his rookie year.. schenn has yet to prove any offensive consistency and you'll end up in the same boat as this season.. if giroux/voracek aren't scoring 2-3 goals per game, the goaltending is an afterthought because they aren't getting enough goal support anyway
sure couturier might not be an offensive dynamo, but the flyers don't have the offensive firepower to spend on improving the defense like a lot of people seem to think.. you have to keep guys who 'have the potential' to make a big difference offensively
There are several and i mean several 18 and 19 and 20 years olds around the league with way more offensive upside than cooter so his age isnt really a factor to me hockey has been getting younger and younger over the past several years. That being said i am not looking to trade him for a over priced nopr overaged Dman i want to trade him for bobby ryan or a guy like that.
in yakupov, saad, and gallagher's case they also play with guys significantly more talented than max talbot and jay rosehill.
the panthers suck, i dont know how huburdeau does what he does.
In those 4 guys case the play with the first line because they are good enough offensively to play on the 1st line. None of those guys teams would have cooter on the 1st line he's just not good enough.
i'm not sure that's true.. RNH is pretty good in edmonton, but i think couturier could compete with him for 1st line time there.. in florida he'd probably be a good 2C (behind huberdeau, with weiss moving to the wing if he's ever healthy).. canadiens, outside of plekanec aren't real strong down the middle.. and you'd be hard pressed to find C's that could play top 6 in chicago
IMO, if briere is bought out as expected, couturier has just as much talent/potential as schenn to play 2C for the flyers
also, on a team that is hurting for forwards that can play defense, couturier leaving would be a big hole.. even if you filled it with a defensive specialist, there goes even more scoring depth (even if it is just potential) that the flyers dont have.
plus, where do you come up w/ the money to trade couturier (1.6) for bobby ryan (5mil).. couturier's production to cap hit is probably one of the better one's on the team.. the flyers get A LOT out of that 1.6 mil, with the potential to get even more out of him next year
My vote is to keep Coots as well.
Wonder what we could get for a Reid / Laughton package? Not much, I'm sure, but would like to see Homer repeat his Timo/Hartnell trade tactic again. Not sure that kind of opportunity exists...
Unless I'm mistaken, RFA offer sheets suck all your 1st Round Picks away.
i think the threshold is like 6 or 7 mil for it to require 4-1st round picks to steal someone away with an offersheet
the hartnell/timo tactic was trading a 1st for the rights to sign both of them.. really worked out that year because the 1st was actually the predators 1st that came over in the forsberg deal
i feel very similarly, maybe even stronger, about keeping read.. couturier is a steal at 1.6, read is akin to plundering fort knox at 900k.. with the cap going down, you gotta keep guys like that.. even though i like him, bschenn would be the guy i would look to move since he carries a cap hit of 3 mil and really doesn't produce at that level
that's if i'm making a move.. i really dont think the flyers should look to do much trading this offseason.. make a sound draft pick, buy out briere and/or bryz, sign a legit veteran goalie to compete w/ mason if you buy out bryz.. and look for buy low opportunities (ie mike green, tyler myers).. i would kick around trades w/ st louis though, they've got a lot of interesting decisions to make, it would be wise to stay up to date w/ what they're doing (but dear god, not jaybo)
Toatally agree with the whole last paragraph. Get healthy and have a better goalie and play on!
I totally agree with Homer when he says we need to improve our D.
Concur also that Read's salary makes him a steal, but, in the quest for better D:
- I don't think Read's a crucial element;
- His low salary should increase his value (IMO) to teams up against the cap wall, and to teams with owners who don't want to open their wallets;
- Gotta give up something to get something, and see first bullet above.
like the flyers. IMO read is the most versatile forward the flyers have, and at 900k it makes almost no sense to move him IMO.. he can play any position in the top 12 and be a good fit there. center, left, right, pk, PP, he can do it all. IMO, in a salary cap world, Read is a crucial element.
as far as improving the D.. my question is, why? who on the defense was so horrific this season that he needs to be upgraded? coburn had a bit of a down year, grossmann and mesz were fine while they were healthy. timonen and schenn were great-to-fantastic. gervais/huskins/gus/lauridsen/manning/bourdon(health?) are all more than capable 6th dmen. the flyers went through something like 13 dmen this year and the defense was probably strongest when lauridsen and gustafsson were playing in the 3/4 roles. it was 100% how they played, not the personnel. when you play a run and gun offense, it really doesn't matter who you have playing defense, they're going to be hung out to dry repeatedly. especially when briere, schenn, simmonds, giroux (at times), voracek (at times), and hartnell refuse to play defense. trading read or couturier makes things even worse on that front. you're cutting off your nose to spite your face at that point. you might get a better dman, but they're going to get even less support from the forwards. preventing goals is a 6-man effort in hockey, have 2 superstars and a good goalie still wont negate having 3 forwards that don't play defense
i'm all for improving the team where you can. but when you have to cut 6-8 mil in cap hits, just to get under the new cap, moving the guys on your team that are actually under-paid is not a good way to do it. especially when you're trying to improve team defense by getting rid of the only forwards who consistently play defense and can still provide offense
I agree with most of this except for Mezz looked terrible and cant stay healthy. If someone wants him for a pair of used skates im all for it to move his salary and Coburn had a lot more than a down year he was Horrible and i mean HORRIBLE. I cant think of one of our Dmen that wasnt miles better than him this season.