- Thread starter
- #1
jbuck
Active Member
we should have kept reader. guys like him you don't replace. save the $ somewhere else. as soon as they want a check, off they go
He hasn't suited up yet this year, IIRC.we should have kept reader. guys like him you don't replace. save the $ somewhere else. as soon as they want a check, off they go
Agreed. Bengals made the appropriate moves to replace and add depth. You can't plan on injuries all to the same position. Bengals had depth until an unusual rash of injuries hit that specific position.I think letting Reader go was the right move. He isn't back yet and I'm not sure he'll be himself when he does make it back. It was a tough year to be in the FA market for a defensive tackle.