Question about my other dynasty league. I have CJ Anderson. Should I sacrifice drafting a young guy by keeping Ball?
The D's surprised me as well, although I have to admit I at least gave the Seahawks a brief thought. Now with Houston gone, I'm looking them over a bit.
Question about my other dynasty league. I have CJ Anderson. Should I sacrifice drafting a young guy by keeping Ball?
I have no way of knowing before the keeper deadline.Depends who that guy would be.
I have no way of knowing before the keeper deadline.
We have a roster of 20 and here are my keepers:
Newton, Anderson, Bell(DET), Freeman, Matthews, Nelson, Benjamin, Cooks, Robinson, Julius Thomas, Seattle D, Parkey.
If I stick with this group I would have only 8 picks and two of which must be IDPs. First three rounds are recycled players and keeper picks start in the 4th round.
I wouldn't bank in anything in that Denver backfield. There was a reason Anderson was 3rd string last year and only got a chance because of two injuries. He's not some sort of elite talent or anything. That being said, you might be better off with someone not in such an odd situation. No idea what that Bronco offense will look like next year. Or who will still be around to run it.
Im still trying to trade for Jeremy Hill. That is part of the reason I acquired Allen Robinson...the guy that has Hill has a hard on for him
I think that offense takes a huge step forward from last year. Granted it was a dumpster fire last year...I am not high on robinson... I don't trust players on a team that will have trouble scoring this season...
I think that offense takes a huge step forward from last year. Granted it was a dumpster fire last year...
They addressed their OL, which was a joke, and Bortles is getting more positive reviews. Robinson has been a star here so far this offseason.
Im still trying to trade for Jeremy Hill. That is part of the reason I acquired Allen Robinson...the guy that has Hill has a hard on for him
It was more like he was the more well rounded back, I don't recall anyone saying he was the most talented. Ball was great at a few things, bad at others, same with Hillman, Anderson was good at petty much everything. But that'll be a moot point once Peyton is proven to not be the threat he was, if we're not already there. It'll all depend on Kubs system, something that's new to this line, and it's a line with basically four new starters after having to shuffle everyone around. Thes a lot going on with that offense in Denver, not much of it is good.you say that... But I heard many analysts last pre season to say Anderson was the most talented back for Denver... Also, when Ball went down, almost everyone I heard from all thought Anderson would take over right away... Sometimes teams go with the MORE proven guy over there more talented players...
It was more like he was the more well rounded back, I don't recall anyone saying he was the most talented. Ball was great at a few things, bad at others, same with Hillman, Anderson was good at petty much everything. But that'll be a moot point once Peyton is proven to not be the threat he was, if we're not already there. It'll all depend on Kubs system, something that's new to this line, and it's a line with basically four new starters after having to shuffle everyone around. Thes a lot going on with that offense in Denver, not much of it is good.
With Montee, it's also gonna depend on how long Peyton holds a grudge.
Not after this year I don't think it will. Id be more than a little surprised to see Peyton suiting up for 2016With Montee, it's also gonna depend on how long Peyton holds a grudge.