tomodach10
Well-Known Member
On another note. It looks like we may need a kicker. I keep hearing Maher is struggling.
You want to spend the next 4-5 years or more finding a QB?. Then you wasted your young running back, and young defense, sucking grooming a young QB. Not me. I don't want to spend more years looking for a QB when we have one. He is not elite, but he damn sure can win for us. Good QB's are hard to find.
I think part of what some might not be thinking about.I would not extend him this year but its not my $$ nor my team im just a fan
Why? It's the opposite, no? If we don't extend him this year at all we only incur a $2M cap hit the savings against the cap for not having to amortize the bonus money at all can be rolled into next year when we start paying him and we also keep from having to restructure anyone else and move their money back. Plus, the first year of his new deal is going to be the same cap hit whether we do it this year or next year since the bonus is spread over 5 years. It's year 5 after the bonus would have already been accounted for if signed this year but we still have one year left to allocate it to if signed next year that we see a benefit.I think part of what some might not be thinking about.
If you extend him while still on the cheap of his rookie deal. it is easier to spread the bonus money over the cheap years so it doesnt ding the cap as bad as when they just have a brand new contract.
Unless the Cowboys have doubts about Dak. Which I dont believe they do. it is best to just extend him this year. Cheaper as well. If you wait til next year. More QBs will get signed just moving that QB contract # up even higher. I wish we would have signed Dak before the Wentz deal. (or even better before the Wilson deal)
I am about as close to 100% confident as you can get he has an extension before week 1.
well you have a point if we are up against the cap to tight, but I don't see that as of now.Why? It's the opposite, no? If we don't extend him this year at all we only incur a $2M cap hit the savings against the cap for not having to amortize the bonus money at all can be rolled into next year when we start paying him and we also keep from having to restructure anyone else and move their money back. Plus, the first year of his new deal is going to be the same cap hit whether we do it this year or next year since the bonus is spread over 5 years. It's year 5 after the bonus would have already been accounted for if signed this year but we still have one year left to allocate it to if signed next year that we see a benefit.
You can only spread bonuses out for 5 years. Regardless I don't think we can say it's better for the cap to sign him earlier. The more you push back the less high earning years a player has when he only has 10 seasons. But, I can't argue the point that if Dak has a good year he will cost us a lot more. I'm just saying I see that as an awesome thing. I'll give him $3M more per year next year and feel more comfortable if he has a big year.well you have a point if we are up against the cap to tight, but I don't see that as of now.
not just signing bonuses, but they can throw a roster bonus on his really cheap year so not to have to back load the extension later. (or whatever inventive bonuses they use nowadays.) Gives more maneuverability in where the money is put. Because I believe he will still be a cowboy after the extension.
And i hope he is a Cowboy after the extension too. That's the best case scenario.well you have a point if we are up against the cap to tight, but I don't see that as of now.
not just signing bonuses, but they can throw a roster bonus on his really cheap year so not to have to back load the extension later. (or whatever inventive bonuses they use nowadays.) Gives more maneuverability in where the money is put. Because I believe he will still be a cowboy after the extension.
I figure he should end up around Rodgers money. 33.5 mil Always figured over the wentz deal & less than the Wilson dealWord is Dak has turned down 30 million per yr. Wow. Hopefully this isn’t true.
It's trueWord is Dak has turned down 30 million per yr. Wow. Hopefully this isn’t true.
I figure he should end up around Rodgers money. 33.5 mil Always figured over the wentz deal & less than the Wilson deal
We always knew he wouldnt take the low side of a top 5 money. Not how QB contract work unfortunately. I just hope he isnt gonna be so stubborn to be highest paid 35+
Which depending on the agent. Might be the possibility.
I agreeWell I guess get what you can while you can. I personally think it is crazy but if they are willing to give it ,so be it
I agree with this. The Cowboys offered him what would be the 6th highest salary in the league. Let him play out this season, worst case scenario, they franchise him and have to give him the average of the top 5. I wouldn't offer another penny right nowI agree
Dak loves it when he's doubted...was in HS, Miss St and as a pro. I say let him play out his contract this year, which seems to be the direction Dak prefers. So be it...maybe it's a win win in the long run.
the longer we wait. The more expensive it will get.I agree with this. The Cowboys offered him what would be the 6th highest salary in the league. Let him play out this season, worst case scenario, they franchise him and have to give him the average of the top 5. I wouldn't offer another penny right now
I agree
Dak loves it when he's doubted...was in HS, Miss St and as a pro. I say let him play out his contract this year, which seems to be the direction Dak prefers. So be it...maybe it's a win win in the long run.
It's not doubting himI was meaning that I think it’s crazy for Dak not to sign. Offering him 30 million per year is not doubting him in my opinion.
That depends on what he wants. If he wants to see the bar, he won't get that because he can be franchised twice. He's gonna be here 3 more years either way. If they let him play out his rookie deal and then franchise him twice, that'll be 3 years at around 69 million, 23/per. If they up him to 33 now, it's 99 the next 3(maybe lower salary but cap hit). I'd let him play this year outthe longer we wait. The more expensive it will get.
The only way your way is better, is if we dont plan on resigning him long term at all.
Which I give a less than 1% chance. So dont see any reason to wait til next year. it will just cost us more & we are gonna do it anyways.
There are a lot of reasons to let him play out the year. Financially if he plays horribly he will indeed get less if we keep him or perhaps we decide to not commit to him long term at all if he has a bad year. He could also get hurt and see his career end. I don't expect either of those two to happen, but they could and while both are bad for the team they would save us money. They are reasons that a player with a year left on his contract may take less - the old bird in the hand.the longer we wait. The more expensive it will get.
The only way your way is better, is if we dont plan on resigning him long term at all.
Which I give a less than 1% chance. So dont see any reason to wait til next year. it will just cost us more & we are gonna do it anyways.