- Thread starter
- #1
True Lakers Fan
Los Angeles Lakers Fan
Barkley and the baboons that work with him on TNT are suggesting that Lebron and Kawhi are better all around players. Then you have Lebron trying to be a philosopher about what you really call a mvp player and of course we are going to hear plenty from the Lebron Slurpers. And perhaps Lebron is the best player all around - but I would still take Curry over Lebron for several reasons. The first and biggest reason is age and decline. No one wants to hear it, but father time is undefeated and a star player in the limelight is limited. The second reason - Lebron had plenty of chances to win more titles, but going down the stretch he failed to find ways to make the other players better and had the tendency to give up in the fourth quarter. In short he is not really a good closer and I think he was lucky to win any championships. Curry is one hell of a closer and granted that he might have a better cast of players then Lebron, I think one could argue that Curry also knew how to work with the other players as a team more then Lebron.